Article Data

  • Views 433
  • Dowloads 148

Original Research

Open Access

Comparison of mNutric score and NRS-2002 screening tools in neurosurgery intensive care units

  • Şule Göktürk1,*,
  • Yasin Göktürk1
  • Aslı Gizem Çapar2
  • Eda Başmısırlı2
  • Yusuf Aykemat2
  • Neriman İnanç2

1Department of Neurosurgery, Kayseri City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, 38080 Kayseri, Turkey

2Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Nuh Naci Yazgan University, 38170 Kayseri, Turkey

DOI: 10.22514/sv.2025.057 Vol.21,Issue 4,April 2025 pp.103-110

Submitted: 24 July 2024 Accepted: 20 November 2024

Published: 08 April 2025

*Corresponding Author(s): Şule Göktürk E-mail: suleGOKTURK@outlook.com

Abstract

Background: Typically, the Nutritional Risk Screening-2002 (NRS-2002) is employed to detect the risk of malnutrition in inpatients, including those in the intensive care unit (ICU). Meanwhile, the Nutrition Risk in the Critically ill (Nutric) Score and also the modified form of it (mNutric Score) are specifically used to screen and predict mortality among ICU patients. The main aim of this study was to perform a comparative analysis between the m Nutric Score and NRS-2002 in order to early and accurately assess the risk of malnutrition in the ICU. Additionally, the study purposed to provide insights into the prospective application of nutritional screening tools. Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out on 101 patients aged 18 years and older in the Neurosurgery ICU in the province of Kayseri, Turkey, between June and September 2022. The anthropometric measurements and biochemical findings of the patients were examined. The risk of malnutrition was determined using the NRS-2002 and mNutric score and compared with each other. Results: When nutritional risk screening results were examined, no distinction was found among groups for mNutric Score (p < 0.05) or NRS-2002 levels (p > 0.05). Significant differences were observed between Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, Glasgow coma score (GCS), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, and blood albumin levels when comparing patients in different mNutric Score risk groups (p < 0.05). Additionally, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis and overall findings highlighted a divergence between mNutric Score and NRS-2002, indicating limited agreement in assessing nutritional risk. Conclusions: This study revealed that the mNutric Score and NRS-2002 demonstrated limited compatibility when assessing the nutritional risks of patients in the neurology ICU. In the ICU population, the use of mNutric Score be a more unique scale to detect nutritional risk and status of the ICU patients.


Keywords

Neurosurgery intensive care unit; mNutric score; NRS-2002


Cite and Share

Şule Göktürk,Yasin Göktürk,Aslı Gizem Çapar,Eda Başmısırlı,Yusuf Aykemat,Neriman İnanç. Comparison of mNutric score and NRS-2002 screening tools in neurosurgery intensive care units. Signa Vitae. 2025. 21(4);103-110.

References

[1] Mukhopadhyay A, Henry J, Ong V, Leong CS, Teh AL, van Dam RM, et al. Association of modified NUTRIC score with 28-day mortality in critically ill patients. Clinical Nutrition. 2017; 36: 1143–1148.

[2] Lin PY, Yen YT, Lam CT, Li KC, Lu MJ, Hsu HS. Use of modified-NUTRIC score to assess nutritional risk in surgical intensive care unit. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association. 2021; 84: 860–864.

[3] Adam S. Standardization of nutritional support: are protocols useful? Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. 2000; 16: 283–289.

[4] Natsch S, van der Meer JW. The role of clinical guidelines, policies and stewardship. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2003; 53: 172–176.

[5] Ojo O. Enteral feeding for nutritional support in critically ill patients. British Journal of Nursing. 2017; 26: 666–669.

[6] Kondrup J, Rasmussen HH, Hamberg O, Stanga Z; Ad Hoc ESPEN Working Group. Nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002): a new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials. Clinical Nutrition. 2003; 22: 321–336.

[7] Ata Ur-Rehman HM, Ishtiaq W, Yousaf M, Bano S, Mujahid AM, Akhtar A. Modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) Score to assess nutritional risk in mechanically ventilated patients: a prospective observational study from the Pakistani population. Cureus. 2018; 10: e3786.

[8] Heyland DK, Dhaliwal R, Jiang X, Day AG. Identifying critically ill patients who benefit the most from nutrition therapy: the development and initial validation of a novel risk assessment tool. Critical Care. 2011; 15: R268.

[9] Lomivorotov VV, Efremov SM, Boboshko VA, Nikolaev DA, Vedernikov PE, Deryagin MN, et al. Prognostic value of nutritional screening tools for patients scheduled for cardiac surgery. Interdisciplinary CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery. 2013; 16: 612–618.

[10] Rahman A, Hasan RM, Agarwala R, Martin C, Day AG, Heyland DK. Identifying critically-ill patients who will benefit most from nutritional therapy: further validation of the “modified NUTRIC” nutritional risk assessment tool. Clinical Nutrition. 2016; 35: 158–162.

[11] Jeong DH, Hong SB, Lim CM, Koh Y, Seo J, Kim Y, et al. Comparison of accuracy of NUTRIC and modified NUTRIC Scores in predicting 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis: a single center retrospective study. Nutrients. 2018; 10: 911.

[12] Zhang P, He Z, Yu G, Peng D, Feng Y, Ling J, et al. The modified NUTRIC score can be used for nutritional risk assessment as well as prognosis prediction in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Clinical Nutrition. 2021; 40: 534–541.

[13] Liberti A, Piacentino E, Umbrello M, Muttini S. Comparison between Nutric Score and modified nutric score to assess ICU mortality in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN. 2021; 44: 479–482.

[14] McClave SA, Taylor BE, Martindale RG, Warren MM, Johnson DR, Braunschweig C, et al. Society of Critical Care Medicine; American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Guidelines for the provision and assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the Adult Critically Ill patient: society of critical care medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.). Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 2016; 40: 159–211.

[15] Singer P, Blaser AR, Berger MM, Alhazzani W, Calder PC, Casaer MP, et al. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit. Clinical Nutrition. 2019; 38: 48–79.

[16] Gonzalez MC, Bielemann RM, Kruschardt PP, Orlandi SP. Complementarity of NUTRIC score and Subjective Global Assessment for predicting 28-day mortality in critically ill patients. Clinical Nutrition. 2019; 38: 2846–2850.

[17] Akmansu M, Kurt G, Demircan V, Senturk E. Results of chordoma patients treated by different approaches in a single institution. Turkish Neurosurgery. 2020; 30: 366–370.

[18] Weir CB, Jan A. BMI classification percentile and cut off points. StatPearls: Treasure Island (FL). 2024.

[19] Iino C, Shimoyama T, Igarashi T, Aihara T, Ishii K, Sakamoto J, et al. Usefulness of the Glasgow-Blatchford score to predict 1-week mortality in patients with esophageal variceal bleeding. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2017; 29: 547–551.

[20] Beigmohammadi MT, Amoozadeh L, Rezaei Motlagh F, Rahimi M, Maghsoudloo M, Jafarnejad B, et al. Mortality predictive value of APACHE II and SOFA Scores in COVID-19 patients in the intensive care unit. Canadian Respiratory Journal. 2022; 2022: 5129314.

[21] Lelubre C, Anselin S, Zouaoui Boudjeltia K, Biston P, Piagnerelli M. Interpretation of C-reactive protein concentrations in critically ill patients. BioMed Research International. 2013; 2013: 124021.

[22] Gatta A, Verardo A, Bolognesi M. Hypoalbuminemia. Internal and Emergency Medicine. 2012; 7: S193–S199.

[23] Ñamendys-Silva SA, González-Herrera MO, Texcocano-Becerra J, Herrera-Gómez A. Hypoalbuminemia in critically ill patients with cancer: incidence and mortality. The American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care. 2011; 28: 253–257.

[24] Dubois MJ, Orellana-Jimenez C, Melot C, De Backer D, Berre J, Leeman M, et al. Albumin administration improves organ function in critically ill hypoalbuminemic patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled, pilot study. Critical Care Medicine. 2006; 34: 2536–2540.

[25] Kendall H, Abreu E, Cheng AL. Serum albumin trend is a predictor of mortality in ICU patients with sepsis. Biological Research for Nursing. 2019; 21: 237–244.

[26] Lew CCH, Wong GJY, Cheung KP, Chua AP, Chong MFF, Miller M. Association between malnutrition and 28-day mortality and intensive care length-of-stay in the critically ill: a prospective cohort study. Nutrients. 2017; 10: 10.

[27] Machado Dos Reis A, Marchetti J, Forte Dos Santos A, Franzosi OS, Steemburgo T. NUTRIC Score: isolated and combined use with the NRS-2002 to predict hospital mortality in critically ill patients. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 2020; 44: 1250–1256.

[28] İleri İ, Özsürekci C, Halil MG, Gündoğan K. NRS-2002 and mNUTRIC score: could we predict mortality of hematological malignancy patients in the ICU? Nutrition in Clinical Practice. 2022; 37: 1199–1205.

[29] Gulsoy KY, Orhan S. The relationship between mortality and the Modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) and Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) Scores in the intensive care unit. Journal of College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan. 2022; 32: 848–854.

[30] Majari K, Imani H, Hosseini S, Amirsavadkouhi A, Ardehali SH, Khalooeifard R. Comparison of Modified NUTRIC, NRS-2002, and MUST Scores in Iranian critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units: a prospective cohort study. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 2021; 45: 1504–1513.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.

Index Copernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.3 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top