Article Data

  • Views 374
  • Dowloads 109

Original Research

Open Access

Analysis of early in-hospital mortality risk factors in patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection involving coronary arteries after surgery

  • Qilin Long1,*,†,
  • Yaqin Qiu2,†
  • Zhanyuan Zhao1
  • Ting Yang1
  • Hu Li1
  • Ying Cong1
  • Hongkai Liang1

1Surgery Intensive Care Unit, Zhongshan City People’s Hospital, 528400 Zhongshan, Guangdong, China

2Nephrology Department 2, Zhongshan City People’s Hospital, 528400 Zhongshan, Guangdong, China

DOI: 10.22514/sv.2025.054 Vol.21,Issue 4,April 2025 pp.77-87

Submitted: 27 December 2024 Accepted: 13 March 2025

Published: 08 April 2025

*Corresponding Author(s): Qilin Long E-mail: Longqilin_666@163.com

† These authors contributed equally.

Abstract

Background: To identify the risk factors associated with early in-hospital mortality in patients with Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection (ATAAD) involving the coronary arteries after surgical intervention. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 74 patients diagnosed with ATAAD involving coronary arteries treated at our hospital between August 2018 and March 2024. They were categorized into two groups: a survival group (n = 30) and a mortality group (n = 44) based on their outcomes at discharge. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for early in-hospital mortality, based on which a diagnostic model was developed. Results: Independent risk factors for early in-hospital mortality included ascending aortic diameter (in mm), duration of ventilator use (≥96 hours), postoperative aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels (in U/L), high-sensitivity troponin levels >2000 ng/L and the occurrence of malignant arrhythmia. The diagnostic model based on these factors exhibited excellent predictive performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.945, sensitivity of 88.6% and specificity of 93.3%. Additionally, the calibration plot demonstrated high consistency between predicted and observed outcomes. Conclusions: The proposed diagnostic model, using five key factors: ascending aortic diameter, duration of ventilator use, postoperative AST levels, high-sensitivity troponin levels and malignant arrhythmia, could be promising for predicting early in-hospital mortality in patients with ATAAD involving coronary arteries after surgery.


Keywords

Stanford type A aortic dissection; Involving coronary arteries; In-hospital mortality; Risk factors


Cite and Share

Qilin Long,Yaqin Qiu,Zhanyuan Zhao,Ting Yang,Hu Li,Ying Cong,Hongkai Liang. Analysis of early in-hospital mortality risk factors in patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection involving coronary arteries after surgery. Signa Vitae. 2025. 21(4);77-87.

References

[1] Sen G, Veitch A, Nabais S. Anterior STEMI complicating acute aortic syndrome: mechanistic insight and bridge to surgery with intravascular ultrasound-guided primary PCI. BMJ Case Reports. 2022; 15: e248055.

[2] Tang T, Wang Z, Zhou W, Wang H, Zhang H, Sun A, et al. Management of chronic Stanford type A aortic dissection combined with Neri type C coronary occlusion: a case report and literature review. Journal of International Medical Research. 2023; 51: 3000605231166505.

[3] Wang M, Fan R, Gu T, Zou C, Zhang Z, Liu Z, et al. Short-term outcomes of acute coronary involvement in type A aortic dissection without myocardial ischemia: a multiple center retrospective cohort study. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 2021; 16: 107.

[4] Bossone E, LaBounty TM, Eagle KA. Acute aortic syndromes: diagnosis and management, an update. European Heart Journal. 2018; 39: 739–749d.

[5] Hashimoto O, Saito Y, Sasaki H, Yumoto K, Oshima S, Tobaru T, et al. Treatment strategies and in-hospital mortality in patients with type A acute aortic dissection and coronary artery involvement. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2022; 167: 596–601.e3.

[6] Qin W, Fan R, Wang J, Li J, Huang F, Chen X. Outcomes of surgical treatment on type A acute aortic dissection accompanied with coronary artery involvement. Frontiers in Surgery. 2022; 9: 950264.

[7] Gundlund A, Køber L, Høfsten DE, Vester-Andersen M, Pedersen MW, Torp-Pedersen C, et al. Rehospitalizations, repeated aortic surgery, and death in initial survivors of surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection and the significance of age—a nationwide registry-based cohort study. European Heart Journal—Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes. 2023; 9: 520–528.

[8] Guo Z, Huang S, Wu Q, Xiao Y, Li M, Zhou Q, et al. Development and validation on death risk model of Stanford type A aortic dissection based on Cox regression. Chinese Critical Care Medicine. 2021; 33: 1315–1321. (In Chinese)

[9] Nienaber CA, Clough RE, Sakalihasan N, Suzuki T, Gibbs R, Mussa F, et al. Aortic dissection. Nature Reviews Disease Primers. 2016; 2: 1–18.

[10] Creswell LL, Kouchoukos NT, Cox JL, Rosenbloom M. Coronary artery disease in patients with type A aortic dissection. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 1995; 59: 585–590.

[11] Saito Y, Hashimoto O, Nakayama T, Sasaki H, Yumoto K, Oshima S, et al. Right versus left coronary artery involvement in patients with type A acute aortic dissection. International Journal of Cardiology. 2023; 371: 49–53.

[12] Chang Y, Guo H, Yu C, Sun X, Yang K, Qian X. A novel classification, management and long-term outcomes of coronary artery involvement in acute aortic dissection. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders. 2023; 23: 313.

[13] Khwaja A. KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury. Nephron Clinical Practice. 2012; 120: c179–c184.

[14] Zhang Y, Yang Y, Guo J, Zhang X, Cheng Y, Sun T, et al. Risk factors for early death after surgery in patients with acute Stanford type A aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Cardiology. 2023; 377: 33–41.

[15] Sun L, Li X, Wang G, Sun J, Zhang X, Chi H, et al. Relationship between length and curvature of ascending aorta and type A dissection. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2022; 9: 927105.

[16] Eliathamby D, Gutierrez M, Liu A, Ouzounian M, Forbes TL, Tan KT, et al. Ascending aortic length and its association with type A aortic dissection. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2021; 10: e020140.

[17] Della Corte A, Rubino AS, Montella AP, Bancone C, Lo Presti F, Galbiati D, et al. Implications of abnormal ascending aorta geometry for risk prediction of acute type A aortic dissection. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2021; 60: 978–986.

[18] Wu Y, Gong M, Fan R, Gu T, Qian X, Zhang H. Analysis of ascending aortic diameter and long‐term prognosis in patients with ascending aortic dissection. Echocardiography. 2021; 38: 531–539.

[19] Elefteriades JA, Farkas EA. Thoracic aortic aneurysm: clinically pertinent controversies and uncertainties. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2010; 55: 841–857.

[20] Chen Q, Deng Y, Li Y, Chen J, Zhang R, Yang L, et al. Association of preoperative aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index with outcomes and tumour microenvironment among colorectal cancer with liver metastases. Cancer Letters. 2024; 588: 216778.

[21] Ichikawa T, Oba H, Owada M, Watanabe K, Yoshimura T, Fuchigami A, et al. Evaluation of the effects of pemafibrate on metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease with hypertriglyceridemia using magnetic resonance elastography combined with fibrosis-4 index and the magnetic resonance imaging-aspartate aminotransferase score. JGH Open. 2023; 7: 959–965.

[22] Liu SH, Burgan J, Ling K, Loyst RA, Tantone R, Komatsu DE, et al. Aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index suggestive of liver dysfunction predicts early complications after open reduction internal fixation of distal radius fractures. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online. 2024; 6: 1–5.

[23] Miyamoto K, Kaki Y, Katsuki S, Maeda A, Nakamura M, Suzuki K, et al. A Case of Acute Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Later Revealed by Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography. The American Journal of Case Reports. 2022; 23: e936891-1.

[24] Tong F, Wang Y, Sun Z. Development and validation of nomogram models to discriminate between acute aortic syndromes and non-S T-elevation myocardial infarction during troponin-blind period. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2023; 10: 1077712.

[25] Sheng W, Qiao H, Wang Z, Niu Z, Lv X. Analysis of prognosis and risk factors for postoperative hepatic dysfunction in patients with Acute Type A aortic dissection. Anatolian Journal of Cardiology. 2023; 27: 197.

[26] Liu J, Wu M, Xie E, Chen L, Su S, Zeng H, et al. Assessment of liver function for evaluation of short-and long-term outcomes in type B aortic dissection patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2021; 8: 643127.

[27] Zhao Y, Yue Y, Wang Y, Zhao W, Feng G. The risk factors for postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome in Stanford type A acute aortic dissection patients. American Journal of Translational Research. 2021; 13: 7318.

[28] Kimura S, Sato H, Shimajiri S, Umehara T, Noguchi H, Niino D, et al. Association of troponin I and macrophages in cardiac tamponade with Stanford type A aortic dissection. Heliyon. 2023; 9: e20791.

[29] Jenab Y, Ahmadi-Tafti SH, Davarpasand T, Jalali A, Khederlou H. Association of the high-sensitive cardiac troponin T levels and long-term mortality in patients with acute aortic dissection type A. Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research. 2023; 15: 116.

[30] Chen Y, Dun Y, Yu Y, Ren X, An Y, Ma Y, et al. Preoperative diagnostic value of coronary CT angiography in acute Stanford type A aortic dissection involving the coronary arteries. Clinical Radiology. 2024; 79: e57–e64.

[31] Ma GN, Hong H, Alwalid O, Cao YK, Hu XH, Han P, et al. Utility of ECG-gated CTA for detecting and classifying coronary artery involvement in patients with type A aortic dissection and sinus of valsalva involvement. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2021; 217: 1334–1343.

[32] Asami F, Yamamoto K, Katsu M, Okamoto Y, Ooba E, Takesue Y, et al. Stanford type A acute aortic dissection with acute myocardial infarction due to compression of left main coronary artery: report of a case. Kyobu Geka. 2022; 75: 688–692.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.

Index Copernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.3 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top