Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Spinal anaesthesia with 4 mg versus 3 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 10 µg of fentanyl for adult anorectal surgery: faster recovery with prolonged analgesia
1Department of Anaesthesiology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT-50161 Kaunas, Lithuania
2Department of Anaesthesiology, Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Clinics, LT-50161 Kaunas, Lithuania
3Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT-44307 Kaunas, Lithuania
DOI: 10.22514/sv.2025.020 Vol.21,Issue 2,February 2025 pp.42-50
Submitted: 01 May 2024 Accepted: 09 October 2024
Published: 08 February 2025
*Corresponding Author(s): Jūratė Gudaitytė E-mail: jurate.gudaityte@kaunoklinikos.lt
Background: The study was designed to test the hypothesis that fentanyl added to low-dose spinal hyperbaric bupivacaine reduces the effective dose of bupivacaine with faster recovery and similar quality of anaesthesia for anorectal surgery. Methods: 132 adult consecutive American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) 1–3 patients were randomized to receive spinal anaesthesia (SA) in the sitting position with hyperbaric bupivacaine (Marcaine Spinal Heavy 0.5%) injected over 2 minutes: Group S4 (n = 66) 0.8 mL, Group S3F (n = 66) 0.6 mL + fentanyl 10 µg to 0.8 mL. After sitting for 10 minutes, surgery was started. The rate of success, level and duration of sensory and motor block, time to voiding, ambulation, complications, consumption of analgesics, quality of anaesthesia according to the patient and medical staff (0–2 score) were assessed. Student’s t, Mann-Whitney, Analysis of variance (ANOVA), Kruskall-Wallis and χ2 tests were used. Characteristics of SA are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), no of cases (%), median (range), p < 0.05* regarded as statistically significant. Results: Maximum level of sensory block was 7.7 ± 1.4 vs. 7.0 ± 1.8 dermatomes, Group S3F vs. Group S4. Level of motor block was 0 Bromage score in >85% of cases in both groups. Mean duration of sensory block was 212.7 ± 35.1* vs. 229.5 ± 36.5 minutes, Group S3F vs. Group S4. Median time to urinate was 260 (120–960)* vs. 315 (160–1140) minutes, Group S4 vs. Group S3F. Quality of anaesthesia was comparable among groups. Pruritus was recorded in 4 cases vs. 0, Group S3F vs. Group S4 (p < 0.05). Conclusions: 3 mg of spinal hyperbaric bupivacaine combined with fentanyl produce an adequate level of anaesthesia similar to 4 mg but with faster recovery and prolonged analgesia for adult anorectal surgery. Clinical Trial Registration: The trial was registered retrospectively in ISRCTN registry as ISRCTN84658134 and can be viewed at https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN84658134.
Spinal; Bupivacaine; Fentanyl; Anorectal; Anaesthesia
Jūratė Gudaitytė,Emilija Bučinskaitė-Jukštienė,Tautvydas Ščefanavičius. Spinal anaesthesia with 4 mg versus 3 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 10 µg of fentanyl for adult anorectal surgery: faster recovery with prolonged analgesia. Signa Vitae. 2025. 21(2);42-50.
[1] Ahmed Jonayed S, Alam MS, Al Mamun Choudhury A, Akter S, Chakraborty S. Efficacy, safety, and reliability of surgery on the lumbar spine under general versus spinal anesthesia—an analysis of 64 cases. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma. 2021; 16: 176–181.
[2] Kumar S, Santha N. Low dose and the conventional dose of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine produce comparable outcomes in the lower segment caesarean section. An observational study. Annals of African Medicine. 2022; 21: 390–394.
[3] Ferrarezi WPP, Braga ADFDA, Ferreira VB, Mendes SQ, Brandão MJN, Braga FSDS, et al. Spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. Bupivacaine associated with different doses of fentanyl: randomized clinical trial. Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology. 2021; 71: 642–648.
[4] Sangadala P, Talawar P, Tripathy DK, Kaushal A, Gupta A, Raj N. Comparison of block characteristics and outcomes in opioid-free and opioid-based thoracic continuous spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: a double-blinded randomised controlled trial. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2024; 68: 280–286.
[5] Alnaeli GR, Hwisa SA, Ajaj ARI, Alhuwayj KAO, Elmaggoze SAE. The impact of adding fentanyl to bupivacaine on spinal anesthesia for caesarean. Libyan Journal of Medical Research. 2023; 17: 108–117.
[6] Gudaityte J, Marchertiene I, Karbonskiene A, Saladzinskas Z, Tamelis A, Toker I, et al. Low-dose spinal hyperbaric bupivacaine for adult anorectal surgery: a double-blinded, randomized, controlled study. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 2009; 21: 474–481.
[7] Shim SM, Park JH, Hyun DM, Jeong EK, Kim SS, Lee HM. The effects of adjuvant intrathecal fentanyl on postoperative pain and rebound pain for anorectal surgery under saddle anesthesia. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology. 2018; 71: 213–219.
[8] Gurbet A, Turker G, Girgin NK, Aksu H, Bahtiyar NH. Combination of ultra-low dose bupivacaine and fentanyl for spinal anaesthesia in out-patient anorectal surgery. The Journal of International Medical Research. 2008; 36: 964–970.
[9] Al-Bahar MSIA, Al-Hosainy AM, El-Garhy AMM. Combination of ultra doses bupivacaine plus fentanyl for spinal anesthesia in out-patient anal surgeries. Al-Azhar Medical Journal. 2021; 50: 1599–1612.
[10] Wang H, Peng X, Zhan L, Xiao Y, Zhao B. Effects of intrathecal bupivacaine and bupivacaine plus fentanyl in elderly patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan. 2019; 29: 1133–1137.
[11] Honca M, Dareli N, Kose EA, Honda T, Kutuk S, Unal S, et al. Low-dose levobupivacaine plus fentanyl combination for spinal anesthesia in anorectal surgery. Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology. 2015; 65: 461–465.
[12] Attari MA, Mortazavi Najafabadi F, Talakoob R, Abrishamkar S, Taravati H. Comparison of the effects of 3 methods of intrathecal bupivacaine, bupivacaine-fentanyl, and bupivacaine-fentanyl-magnesium sulfate on sensory motor blocks and postoperative pain in patients undergoing lumbar disk herniation surgery. Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology. 2016; 28: 38–43.
[13] Lawrie CM, OOng AC, Hernandez VH, Rosas S, Post ZD, Orozco FR. Incidence and risk factors for postoperative urinary retention in total hip arthroplasty performed under spinal anesthesia. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2017; 32: 3748–3751.
[14] Kairaluoma P, Bachmann M, Kallio H, Rosenberg P, Pere P. Hyperbaric articaine with or without fentanyl in spinal anaesthesia: patient and observer blinded comparison. Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2013; 57: 118–125.
[15] Fonseca NM, Guimarães GMN, Pontes JPJ, Azi LMTA, de Ávila Oliveira R. Safety and effectiveness of adding fentanyl or sufentanil to spinal anesthesia: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology. 2023; 73: 198–216.
[16] Rhee WJ, Chung CJ, Lim YH, Lee KH, Lee SC. Factors in patient dissatisfaction and refusal regarding spinal anesthesia. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology. 2010; 59: 260–264.
[17] Botea MO, Lungeanu D, Petrica A, Sandor MI, Huniadi AC, Barsac C, et al. Perioperative analgesia and patients’ satisfaction in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: fentanyl versus morphine. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12: 6346.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.
Index Copernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.
Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.
Scopus: CiteScore 1.3 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.
Top