Article Data

  • Views 611
  • Dowloads 145

Systematic Reviews

Open Access

Serious complications associated with nasogastric, orogastric or enteral tube misplacement over the decades: a systematic review

  • Federica Morselli1
  • Rosario Losiggio1
  • Corinne Caldei1
  • Silvia Ferro1
  • Andrey Yavorovskiy2
  • Giovanni Landoni1,3,*,
  • Stefano Fresilli1

1Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy

2Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, 119991 Moscow, Russia

3School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy

DOI: 10.22514/sv.2025.015 Vol.21,Issue 2,February 2025 pp.1-8

Submitted: 28 May 2024 Accepted: 07 November 2024

Published: 08 February 2025

*Corresponding Author(s): Giovanni Landoni E-mail: landoni.giovanni@hsr.it

Abstract

Background: Gastrointestinal tube (GIT) insertion is common in surgical, medical and intensive care unit settings, with approximately 170,000 annual insertions in the UK alone. Despite its apparent simplicity, GIT placement can lead to acute complications, ranging from mucosal lesions to life-threatening conditions. Methods: We conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, searching on PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE and Scopus, all case reports and series describing harm from nasogastic, orogastric, or enteral tube placement. Results: A total of 148 studies reported acute GIT complications in 168 patients (70 patients received an enteral feeding tube). The number of publications increased over time. Half (91 patients, 52%) of the displacements involved the respiratory tract, but other organs were also affected, including the brain (33 patients, 20%), gastrointestinal tract (23 patients, 14%) and intravascular system (6 patients, 4%). Brain misplacement had the highest mortality (60.6%), while for respiratory tract misplacement mortality was 20.9%. Mortality was high in emergency department procedures and acute trauma, while it was low when enteral feeding tubes were involved. Only 30% of the manuscripts reported adherence to guidelines, which was associated with a trend towards decreased mortality. Conclusions: Our findings identify an increasing reporting of GIT misplacement complications and emphasize a variety of involved anatomical sites, from the well-known brain, respiratory tract, and pleural space mispositioning, to gastrointestinal and abdomen perforation, to the extremely uncommon spleen and intravascular mispositioning. The importance of implementing standardized protocols and maintaining heightened clinical vigilance is crucial to mitigate complications related to GIT misplacement. The PROSPERO Registration: PROSPERO CRD42024491074.


Keywords

Anaesthesia; Enteral feeding tube; Nasogastric tube; NGT misplacement; Gastrointestinal tube


Cite and Share

Federica Morselli,Rosario Losiggio,Corinne Caldei,Silvia Ferro,Andrey Yavorovskiy,Giovanni Landoni,Stefano Fresilli. Serious complications associated with nasogastric, orogastric or enteral tube misplacement over the decades: a systematic review. Signa Vitae. 2025. 21(2);1-8.

References

[1] Schroeder J, Sitzer V. Nursing care guidelines for reducing hospital-acquired nasogastric tube-related pressure injuries. Critical Care Nurse. 2019; 39: 54–63.

[2] Lamont T, Beaumont C, Fayaz A, Healey F, Huehns T, Law R, et al. Checking placement of nasogastric feeding tubes in adults (interpretation of x ray images): summary of a safety report from the National Patient Safety Agency. The BMJ. 2011; 342: d2586.

[3] Nascimento A, Carvalho M, Nogueira J, Abreu P, Nzwalo H. Complications associated with nasogastric tube placement in the acute phase of stroke: a systematic review. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing. 2018; 50: 193–198.

[4] Motta APG, Rigobello MCG, Silveira RCCP, Gimenes FRE. Nasogastric/nasoenteric tube-related adverse events: an integrative review. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem. 2021; 29: e3400.

[5] de Aguilar-Nascimento JE, Kudsk KA. Clinical costs of feeding tube placement. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 2007; 31: 269–273.

[6] Sigmon DF, Jason An. Nasogastric tube. StatPearls: Treasure Island (FL). 2024.

[7] Metheny NA, Krieger MM, Healey F, Meert KL. A review of guidelines to distinguish between gastric and pulmonary placement of nasogastric tubes. Heart & Lung. 2019; 48: 226–235.

[8] Irving SY, Rempel G, Lyman B, Sevilla WMA, Northington L, Guenter P; American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Pediatric nasogastric tube placement and verification: best practice recommendations from the NOVEL project. Nutrition in Clinical Practice. 2018; 33: 921–927.

[9] Boeykens K, Steeman E, Duysburgh I. Reliability of pH measurement and the auscultatory method to confirm the position of a nasogastric tube. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2014; 51: 1427–1433.

[10] Spurrier EJ, Johnston AM. Use of nasogastric tubes in trauma patients—a review. Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps. 2008; 154: 10–13.

[11] Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. The BMJ. 2021; 372: n160.

[12] Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. International Journal of Surgery. 2021; 88: 105906.

[13] Ferreras J, Junquera LM, García-Consuegra L. Intracranial placement of a nasogastric tube after severe craniofacial trauma. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2000; 90: 564–566.

[14] Rahimi-Movaghar V, Boroojeny SB, Moghtaderi A, Keshmirian B. Intracranial placement of a nasogastric tube. A lesson to be re-learnt? Acta Neurochirurgica. 2005; 147: 573–574; discussion 574.

[15] Gompels MT, Treger D, Mangal R, Prasad S, Thaller SR. Jumping trends in trampoline-related craniofacial injuries. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2024; 35: 481–484.

[16] Kwon Y, Lim J, Lee C. Analysis of dental traumatic patterns in standing electric scooter-related accidents. Injury. 2024; 55: 111148.

[17] Ministry of Health. Guidelines. 2022. Available at: https://www.moh.gov.sg/hpp/all-healthcare-professionals/guidelines (Accessed: 06 April 2024).

[18] Najafi M. Improving the safety of nasogastric tube insertion by the “SORT maneuver” during the novel coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19). Patient Safety in Surgery. 2021; 15: 4.

[19] Garcia M, Glynn D, Keane B. Nasogastric tube placement in adult patients in the emergency department. 2023. Available at: https://www.lenus.ie/bitstream/handle/10147/640819/IAEM-Clinical-Guideline-NGT-V1.0.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (Accessed: 06 April 2024).

[20] Boeykens K, Holvoet T, Duysburgh I. Nasogastric tube insertion length measurement and tip verification in adults: a narrative review. Critical Care. 2023; 27: 317.

[21] Sahu S, Kishore K, Sachan V, Chatterjee A. A novel and innovative way of nasogastric tube insertion in anesthetized intubated patient. Anesthesia Essays and Researches. 2017; 11: 248–250.

[22] Lin CM, Chou CH, Li TY, Chen TC. Modified fibrescope guided nasogastric tube insertion: Our experience with 23 patients. Clinical Otolaryngology. 2018; 43: 1628–1632.

[23] Jacobson LE, Olayan M, Williams JM, Schultz JF, Wise HM, Singh A, et al. Feasibility and safety of a novel electromagnetic device for small-bore feeding tube placement. Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open. 2019; 4: e000330.

[24] Kozin ED, Remenschneider AK, Cunnane ME, Deschler DG. Otolaryngologist-assisted fluoroscopic-guided nasogastric tube placement in the postoperative laryngectomy patient. Laryngoscope. 2014; 124: 916–920.

[25] Vadivelu N, Kodumudi G, Leffert LR, Pierson DC, Rein LK, Silverman MS, et al. Evolving therapeutic roles of nasogastric tubes: current concepts in clinical practice. Advances in Therapy. 2023; 40: 828–843.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.

Index Copernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.3 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top