Using a mobile application to improve recording during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a mixed-methods study

Background: Accurate documentation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is essential. However, traditional methods, particularly handwriting, often introduce errors and increase the workload of the medical staff. This study aimed to describe the process of developing a tablet application for documenting CPR and to evaluate its accuracy in comparison with a paper-based method. Methods: We organized a multidisciplinary team of medical professionals, developers, and designers. We used a participative human-centered design (HCD) approach that consisted of discovering, defining, developing and delivering solutions. We conducted a simulation study to compare the accuracy of the CPR documentation application with that of the handwriting method, focusing on documentation completeness and temporal fidelity. We evaluated the usability of the application using a System Usability Scale (SUS) and semi-structured interviews. Results: We developed the “CPReCoder” in accordance with the HCD process. The study application consists of two screens: a CPR recording screen and a reporting screen. The CPR recording screen is divided into three zones: zone 1 (patient and prehospital area), zone 2 (CPR code button area) and zone 3 (time information and log area). In the simulation study, the documentation completeness of the “CPReCoder” was significantly higher than that of the handwritten record (96.8% vs. 88.1%, p < 0.001). Both approaches exhibit comparable temporal fidelity. The SUS score of the application was 87.9 points, indicating excellent usability. According to the responses in the interviews, the main benefit of CPReCoder was its ability to reduce workload. Conclusions: We described the process of creating a CPR recording application. Use of the application resulted in a more complete documentation than the handwriting method, and its usability was excellent.

Cardiac arrest; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Documentation; Mobile applications

[1] Martyn-Nemeth P, Hayman LL. Digital technology in cardiovascular health. The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2023; 38: 207–209.

[2] Kallas D, Sandhu N, Gandilo C, Schleicher M, Banks L, Jabara M, et al. Use of digital health technology in heart failure and diabetes: a scoping review. Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research. 2023; 16: 526–540.

[3] Louw C. Digital public health solutions in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: comparative analysis of contact tracing solutions deployed in Japan and Germany. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2023; 25: e44966.

[4] Cha D. Digital healthcare: the new frontier of holistic and efficient care. Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine. 2023; 10: 235–237.

[5] Yeung AWK, Torkamani A, Butte AJ, Glicksberg BS, Schuller B, Rodriguez B, et al. The promise of digital healthcare technologies. Frontiers in Public Health. 2023; 11: 1196596.

[6] Kim JH. Data integration using information and communication technology for emergency medical services and systems. Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine. 2023; 10: 129–131.

[7] Cao W, Kadir AA, Tang W, Wang J, Yuan J, Hassan, II. Effectiveness of mobile application interventions for stroke survivors: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2024; 24: 6.

[8] Chatterjee P, Beck AM, Brager JAL, Durand DJ, D’Adamo CR. The effect of an automated mobile patient engagement application on emergency department revisits: prospective observational study. JMIR Formative Research. 2021; 5: e17839.

[9] Kalz M, Lenssen N, Felzen M, Rossaint R, Tabuenca B, Specht M, et al. Smartphone apps for cardiopulmonary resuscitation training and real incident support: a mixed-methods evaluation study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2014; 16: e89.

[10] Metelmann C, Metelmann B, Schuffert L, Hahnenkamp K, Vollmer M, Brinkrolf P. Smartphone apps to support laypersons in bystander CPR are of ambivalent benefit: a controlled trial using medical simulation. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. 2021; 29: 76.

[11] St-Onge-St-Hilaire A, Cheng A, Davidson J, Wan B, Lin Y. Completeness and accuracy of digital charting vs paper charting in simulated pediatric cardiac arrest: a randomized controlled trial. The Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2024; 26: 94–102.

[12] Nishiyama C, Brown SP, May S, Iwami T, Koster RW, Beesems SG, et al. Apples to apples or apples to oranges? International variation in reporting of process and outcome of care for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2014; 85: 1599–1609.

[13] Nolan JP, Berg RA, Andersen LW, Bhanji F, Chan PS, Donnino MW, et al. Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcome reports: update of the utstein resuscitation registry template for in-hospital cardiac arrest: a consensus report from a task force of the international liaison committee on resuscitation (American Heart Association, European Resuscitation Council, Australian and New Zealand Council on Resuscitation, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa, Resuscitation Council of Asia). Circulation. 2019; 140: e746–e757.

[14] Perkins GD, Jacobs IG, Nadkarni VM, Berg RA, Bhanji F, Biarent D, et al. Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcome reports: update of the utstein resuscitation registry templates for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a statement for healthcare professionals from a task force of the international liaison committee on resuscitation (American Heart Association, European Resuscitation Council, Australian and New Zealand Council on Resuscitation, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa, Resuscitation Council of Asia); and the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and the Council on Cardiopulmonary, Critical Care, Perioperative and Resuscitation. Circulation. 2015; 132: 1286–1300.

[15] Peace JM, Yuen TC, Borak MH, Edelson DP. Tablet-based cardiac arrest documentation: a pilot study. Resuscitation. 2014; 85: 266–269.

[16] Grundgeiger T, Albert M, Reinhardt D, Happel O, Steinisch A, Wurmb T. Real-time tablet-based resuscitation documentation by the team leader: evaluating documentation quality and clinical performance. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. 2016; 24: 51.

[17] Tsekleves E, Cooper R. Emerging trends and the way forward in design in healthcare: an expert’s perspective. The Design Journal. 2017; 20: S2258–S2272.

[18] An Q, Kelley MM, Hanners A, Yen PY. Sustainable development for mobile health apps using the human-centered design process. JMIR Formative Research. 2023; 7: e45694.

[19] Melles M, Albayrak A, Goossens R. Innovating health care: key characteristics of human-centered design. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2021; 33: 37–44.

[20] Panchal AR, Bartos JA, Cabañas JG, Donnino MW, Drennan IR, Hirsch KG, et al. Part 3: adult basic and advanced life support: 2020 american heart association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2020; 142: S366–S468.

[21] Soar J, Bottiger BW, Carli P, Couper K, Deakin CD, Djarv T, et al. European resuscitation council guidelines 2021: adult advanced life support. Resuscitation. 2021; 161: 115–151.

[22] Hayes RJ, Bennett S. Simple sample size calculation for cluster-randomized trials. International Journal of Epidemiology. 1999; 28: 319–326.

[23] Brooke J. SUS: A ‘quick and dirty’ usability scale. In Jordan PW, Thomas B, Weerdmeester BA, McClelland AL (eds.) Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). 1st edn. Taylor and Francis: London. 1996.

[24] Kim SM, Kim T, Cha WC, Lee JH, Kwon IH, Choi Y, et al. User experience of mobile personal health records for the emergency department: mixed methods study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2020; 8: e24326.

[25] Obuchowski NA. On the comparison of correlated proportions for clustered data. Statistics in Medicine. 1998; 17: 1495–1507.

[26] Grigg E, Palmer A, Grigg J, Oppenheimer P, Wu T, Roesler A, et al. Randomised trial comparing the recording ability of a novel, electronic emergency documentation system with the AHA paper cardiac arrest record. Emergency Medicine Journal. 2014; 31: 833–839.