Article Data

  • Views 318
  • Dowloads 143

Original Research

Open Access

Comparing foot and hand cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a non-inferiority, crossover, randomised controlled simulation study

  • Kui Ja Lee1,†
  • Hee Eun Kim2,†
  • Seung Min Park2,3
  • You Hwan Jo2,3
  • Hae Chul Yang2
  • Yong Won Kim4
  • Dong Keon Lee2,3,*,
  • Dong-Hyun Jang3,5,*,

1Department of Paramedicine, Kyungdong University, 26495 Wonju, Republic of Korea

2Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 13620 Seongnam, Republic of Korea

3Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 03080 Seoul, Republic of Korea

4Department of Emergency Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, 10326 Goyang, Republic of Korea

5Department of Public Healthcare Service, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 13620 Seongnam, Republic of Korea

DOI: 10.22514/sv.2025.008 Vol.21,Issue 1,January 2025 pp.60-68

Submitted: 07 April 2024 Accepted: 31 May 2024

Published: 08 January 2025

*Corresponding Author(s): Dong Keon Lee E-mail: goldenegg@snu.ac.kr
*Corresponding Author(s): Dong-Hyun Jang E-mail: jang0621@snu.ac.kr

† These authors contributed equally.

Abstract

Background: High-quality chest compression is crucial during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The present simulation study aimed to evaluate whether the chest compression method using the foot is comparable to that using the hand. Methods: This was a prospective, crossover, non-inferiority, randomised controlled simulation study. Non-inferiority tests were conducted for chest compression depth and rate. To determine non-inferiority, the lower limit of the confidence interval was compared to a pre-specified inferiority margin of −5 mm for chest compression depth. The compression rate was analysed in the same manner, with −17 compressions/min as the inferiority margin. Results: Seventy-two participants were enrolled in this study. The mean chest compression depth was 53.3 (±5.6) mm with foot chest compression (FCC) and 51.5 (±5.8) mm with hand chest compression (HCC). The mean difference between FCC and HCC was 1.8 (95% confidence interval (CI), −0.1 to 3.7) and FCC was not inferior to HCC in compression depth. The mean chest compression rates were 107.6/min and 112/min for FCC and HCC, respectively. The mean difference between FCC and HCC was −4.5/min (95% CI, −1.6 to −7.3) and FCC was not inferior to HCC for the chest compression rate. Conclusions: The results suggest that chest compression using the foot showed non-inferior performance regarding compression depth and rate compared with chest compression using the hand after brief training. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT06719401.


Keywords

Chest compression; (Foot) cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Simulation study


Cite and Share

Kui Ja Lee,Hee Eun Kim,Seung Min Park,You Hwan Jo,Hae Chul Yang,Yong Won Kim,Dong Keon Lee,Dong-Hyun Jang. Comparing foot and hand cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a non-inferiority, crossover, randomised controlled simulation study. Signa Vitae. 2025. 21(1);60-68.

References

[1] Nichol G, Daya MR, Morrison LJ, Aufderheide TP, Vaillancourt C, Vilke GM, et al. Compression depth measured by accelerometer vs. outcome in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2021; 167: 95–104.

[2] Gugelmin-Almeida D, Tobase L, Polastri TF, Peres HHC, Timerman S. Do automated real-time feedback devices improve CPR quality? A systematic review of literature. Resuscitation Plus. 2021; 6: 100108.

[3] Panchal AR, Bartos JA, Cabanas JG, Donnino MW, Drennan IR, Hirsch KG, et al. Part 3: adult basic and advanced life support: 2020 american heart association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2020; 142: S366–S468.

[4] Olasveengen TM, Semeraro F, Ristagno G, Castren M, Handley A, Kuzovlev A, et al. European resuscitation council guidelines 2021: basic life support. Resuscitation. 2021; 161: 98–114.

[5] Peberdy MA, Silver A, Ornato JP. Effect of caregiver gender, age, and feedback prompts on chest compression rate and depth. Resuscitation. 2009; 80: 1169–1174.

[6] Shin SY, Kim JH, Roh SG. The relationship between body composition and chest compression in adult—a manikin study. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology. 2021; 25: 1223–1232.

[7] Bae GE, Choi A, Beom JH, Kim MJ, Chung HS, Min IK, et al. Correlation between real-time heart rate and fatigue in chest compression providers during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a simulation-based interventional study. Medicine. 2021; 100: e25425.

[8] Küçükceran K, Ayranci M, Muhammet Ö. The impact of body mass index values on the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a manikin study. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences. 2021; 11: 269–272.

[9] International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. 2005 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Part 2: adult basic life support. Resuscitation. 2005; 67: 187–201.

[10] Kherbeche H, Exer N, Schuhwerk W, Ummenhofer W, Osterwalder J. Chest compression using the foot or hand method: a prospective, randomized, controlled manikin study with school children. European Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2017; 24: 262–267.

[11] Takahashi Y, Saitoh T, Okada M, Satoh H, Akai T, Mochizuki T, et al. The potential of leg-foot chest compression as an alternative to conventional hands-on compression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2019; 26: 106–110.

[12] Ott M, Krohn A, Bilfield LH, Dengler F, Jaki C, Echterdiek F, et al. Leg-heel chest compression as an alternative for medical professionals in times of COVID-19. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2021; 50: 575–581.

[13] Otero-Agra M, Santiago-Urgal N, Hermo-Gonzalo MT, Fernández-Méndez M, Fernández-Méndez F. CPR by foot. An alternative in special circumstances? A randomized simulation study. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2021; 43: 1–6.

[14] Ümit TB, Sogut O, Az A, Cakmak S, Demirel I. Relationship between measures of thoracic diameter and cardiopulmonary resuscitation-induced thoracoabdominal injury. Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira. 2022; 68: 1470–1475.

[15] Saksobhavivat N, Phattharapornjaroen P, Suksukon P, Atiksawedparit P, Chalermdamrichai P, Saelee R, et al. Optimal chest compression position for cardiopulmonary resuscitation determined by computed tomography image: retrospective cross-sectional analysis. Scientific Reports. 2023; 13: 22763.

[16] Stiell IG, Brown SP, Nichol G, Cheskes S, Vaillancourt C, Callaway CW, et al. What is the optimal chest compression depth during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation of adult patients? Circulation. 2014; 130: 1962–1970.

[17] Atiksawedparit P, Sathapornthanasin T, Chalermdamrichai P, Sanguanwit P, Saksobhavivat N, Saelee R, et al. Using computed tomography to evaluate proper chest compression depth for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in Thai population: a retrospective cross-sectional study. PLOS ONE. 2023; 18: e0279056.

[18] Riggs M, Franklin R, Saylany L. Associations between cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) knowledge, self-efficacy, training history and willingness to perform CPR and CPR psychomotor skills: a systematic review. Resuscitation. 2019; 138: 259–272.

[19] Nas J, Thannhauser J, Vart P, van Geuns R, Muijsers HEC, Mol J, et al. Effect of face-to-face vs virtual reality training on cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality. JAMA Cardiology. 2020; 5: 328.

[20] Roppolo LP, Pepe PE, Campbell L, Ohman K, Kulkarni H, Miller R, et al. Prospective, randomized trial of the effectiveness and retention of 30-min layperson training for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillators: the American airlines study. Resuscitation. 2007; 74: 276–285.

[21] Bylow H, Karlsson T, Claesson A, Lepp M, Lindqvist J, Herlitz J. Self-learning training versus instructor-led training for basic life support: a cluster randomised trial. Resuscitation. 2019; 139: 122–132.

[22] Hung TY, Wen CS, Yu SH, Chen YC, Chen HL, Chen WL, et al. A comparative analysis of aerosol exposure and prevention strategies in bystander, pre-hospital, and inpatient cardiopulmonary resuscitation using simulation manikins. Scientific Reports. 2023; 13: 12552.

[23] Idris AH, Guffey D, Aufderheide TP, Brown S, Morrison LJ, Nichols P, et al. Relationship between chest compression rates and outcomes from cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2012; 125: 3004–3012.

[24] Idris AH, Guffey D, Pepe PE, Brown SP, Brooks SC, Callaway CW, et al. Chest compression rates and survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Critical Care Medicine. 2015; 43: 840–848.

[25] Trenkamp RH, Perez FJ. Heel compressions quadruple the number of bystanders who can perform chest compressions for 10 minutes. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2015; 33: 1449–1453.

[26] Hellevuo H, Sainio M, Nevalainen R, Huhtala H, Olkkola KT, Tenhunen J, et al. Deeper chest compression—more complications for cardiac arrest patients? Resuscitation. 2013; 84: 760–765.

[27] Demirtas A, Guvenc G, Aslan Ö, Unver V, Basak T, Kaya C. Effectiveness of simulation-based cardiopulmonary resuscitation training programs on fourth-year nursing students. Australasian Emergency Care. 2021; 24: 4–10.

[28] Laco RB, Stuart WP. Simulation-based training program to improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation and teamwork skills for the urgent care clinic staff. Military Medicine. 2022; 187: e764–e769.

[29] Faghihi A, Naderi Z, Keshtkar MM, Nikrouz L, Bijani M. A comparison between the effects of simulation of basic CPR training and workshops on firefighters’ knowledge and skills: experimental study. BMC Medical Education. 2024; 24: 178.


Videos

video1.avi

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.

Index Copernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.3 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top