Article Data

  • Views 325
  • Dowloads 142

Original Research

Open Access

The proper use of masks in the COVID-19 pandemic era: an experimental pilot study

  • Hyo Jeong Choi1,†
  • Han Bit Kim2,†
  • Ho Jung Kim2,*,
  • Kyung Hee Kim3

1Department of Emergency Medical Technology, Sun Moon University, 31460 Asan-si, Republic of Korea

2Department of Emergency Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, 14584 Bucheon-si, Republic of Korea

3Department of Sport science, Donga-Otsuka, 02587 Dongdaemun-gu, Republic of Korea

DOI: 10.22514/sv.2024.145 Vol.20,Issue 11,November 2024 pp.63-67

Submitted: 20 April 2022 Accepted: 26 July 2022

Published: 08 November 2024

*Corresponding Author(s): Ho Jung Kim E-mail: loverlydr@schmc.ac.kr

† These authors contributed equally.

Abstract

Community mask wearing and personal hand hygiene behaviors are emphasized as among the primary ways to impede the transmission of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, there is a lack of studies on the efficacy of masks in ensuring safety. This pilot study was designed to investigate the proper use of masks by estimating the changes in temperature and humidity inside masks and examining the bacterial culture of used masks. Two points were set 100 m apart. Two masked participants were made to stand side by side then walk from the first to the second point. When the subjects arrived at the designated destination, we measured the temperature and humidity of each mask and recorded the subjective degree of discomfort on a scale of 10 points. This experiment use the same mask (cotton mask, KF94, anti-droplet mask, dental mask) was repeated ten times. Our results showed that irrespective of the mask used, the inside temperature of a mask was at an average of 2 to 3 degrees higher than the atmospheric temperature, and the humidity inside the mask was twice that on the outside. In all four types of masks investigated, bacterial culture experiments detected similar bacteria found mainly on the skin and mouth for that of the participant. For the walking test, the subjective discomfort was the highest 7.8 ± 1.2 with the anti-droplet mask (p = 0.005). Power walking test, the subjective discomfort was the highest 9.4 ± 0.5 with the KF94 (p = 0.063). Proper mask ventilation is advised, especially in case of subjective discomfort, but only when there is no other person within social distance or while outdoors. For hygienic reasons, discarding a used mask is recommended.


Keywords

COVID-19; KF94; Mask; Ventilation


Cite and Share

Hyo Jeong Choi,Han Bit Kim,Ho Jung Kim,Kyung Hee Kim. The proper use of masks in the COVID-19 pandemic era: an experimental pilot study. Signa Vitae. 2024. 20(11);63-67.

References

[1] Coronaviridae Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. The species severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2. Nature Microbiology. 2020; 5: 536–544.

[2] Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2020; 382: 727–733.

[3] Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. The Lancet. 2020; 395: 497–506.

[4] Lee S, Kim JM. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): pandemic and the challenge of public health. Korean Journal of Family Practice. 2020; 10: 87–95.

[5] Offeddu V, Yung CF, Low MSF, Tam CC. Effectiveness of masks and respirators against respiratory infections in healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2017; 65: 1934–1942.

[6] Veronica Dudarev, Miki Kamatani, Yuki Miyazaki, James T Enns, Jun I Kawahara. The attractiveness of masked faces is influenced by race and mask attitudes. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022; 13: 864936.

[7] Desai AN, Mehrotra P. Medical masks. JAMA. 2020; 323: 1517.

[8] Seale H, Dwyer DE, Cowling BJ, Wang Q, Yang P, MacIntyre CR. A review of medical masks and respirators for use during an influenza pandemic. Influenza and other Respiratory Viruses. 2009; 3: 205–206.

[9] Zhou SS, Lukula S, Chiossone C, Nims RW, Suchmann DB, Ijaz MK. Assessment of a respiratory face mask for capturing air pollutants and pathogens including human influenza and rhinoviruses. Journal of Thoracic Disease. 2018; 10: 2059–2069.

[10] Rewar S, Mirdha D, Rewar P. Treatment and prevention of pandemic H1N1 influenza. Annals of Global Health. 2015; 81: 645–653.

[11] Wang W, Tang J, Wei F. Updated understanding of the outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in Wuhan, China. Journal of Medical Virology. 2020; 92: 441–447.

[12] Li Q, Guan X, Wu P, Wang X, Zhou L, Tong Y, et al. Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2020; 382: 1199–1207.

[13] Torri E, Sbrogio LG, Rosa ED, Cinquetti S, Francia F, Ferro A. Italian public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic: case report from the field, insights and challenges for the department of prevention. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17: 3666.

[14] Wang F, Zhang C. What to do next to control the 2019-nCoV epidemic? The Lancet. 2020; 395: 391–393.

[15] Hui DS, I Azhar E, Madani TA, Ntoumi F, Kock R, Dar O, et al. The continuing 2019-nCoV epidemic threat of novel coronaviruses to global health—the latest 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2020; 91: 264–266.

[16] Li G, De Clercq E. Therapeutic options for the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2020; 19: 149–150.

[17] Menendez R. Risk factors of treatment failure in community acquired pneumonia: implications for disease outcome. Thorax. 2004; 59: 960–965.

[18] Jayaweera M, Perera H, Gunawardana B, Manatunge J. Transmission of COVID-19 virus by droplets and aerosols: a critical review on the unresolved dichotomy. Environmental Research. 2020; 188: 109819.

[19] Cork R, Isaac I, Elsharydah A, Saleemi S, Zavisca F, Alexander L. A comparison of the verbal rating scale and the visual analog scale for pain assessment. The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology. 2003; 8.

[20] Ko JY, Yoon SH, Kim BS. Influence of long-term power walking on obese people’s cardioactive capacity and blood lipids. Journal of Sport and Leisure Studies. 2007; 31: 843–852.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.

Index Copernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.3 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top