Article Data

  • Views 254
  • Dowloads 121

Original Research

Open Access

Is the combination of laser hemorrhoidoplasty and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy superior to conventional surgical techniques in terms of postoperative pain in hemorrhoid patients? A retrospective comparative analysis

  • Fatih Yanar1
  • Aykhan Abbasov2
  • Burak Ilhan1
  • Berke Sengun1
  • Beyza Ozcinar1
  • Basak Erginel3,*,
  • Hakan Yanar1,2

1Department of Surgery, Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, 34093 Istanbul, Turkey

2Department of Surgery, Liv Hospital, 34340 Istanbul, Turkey

3Department of Pediatric Surgery, Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, 34093 Istanbul, Turkey

DOI: 10.22514/sv.2024.135

Submitted: 05 June 2024 Accepted: 20 August 2024

Online publish date: 12 October 2024

*Corresponding Author(s): Basak Erginel E-mail: basak.erginel@istanbul.edu.tr

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate early and long-term results of three surgical methods (Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy, laser hemorrhoidoplasty, and the combined method), especially for pain management in hemorrhoidal disease. Between January 2018 and January 2020, 154 patients diagnosed with symptomatic grade II–III hemorrhoid disease were treated with three surgical techniques: (1) Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy (FH);(2) laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP); (3) combined (Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy + laser hemorrhoidoplasty) method. Patients were retrospectively evaluated for duration of surgery, recovery time of symptoms, postoperative pain, early and late complications, and recurrence. When the postoperative early and mid-term pain levels of the patients were compared, the results showed that patients treated with the Ferguson technique had the most severe pain scores after surgery at postoperative 6th, 12th, 24th hours, and 1st week, compared to the other techniques (LHP and combined method) (p < 0.001). The LHP method had the lowest pain levels when compared to the Ferguson and the combined methods (p < 0.001). The combined method had significantly lower pain scores than the Ferguson method in all periods after surgery (p < 0.001). Upon the development of postoperative perianal thrombosis in two patients in the LHP group, one patient underwent thrombectomy, and the other patient underwent medical treatment. There were two hemorrhoid disease recurrences, with a median follow-up period of 24 (12–36) months in the LHP group. In the FH group, reoperation and hemostasis were done for bleeding on the postoperative sixth day in one patient, and a Foley catheter was applied due to urinary retention in one patient. Two anal fissures were seen postoperatively in one month in the FH group and recovered with medical treatment. In patients with multiple hemorrhoid packages, the combined method can be better used safely and effectively, with significantly lower pain scores than the Ferguson method only.


Keywords

Hemorrhoids; Laser hemorrhoidoplasty; Hemorrhoidectomy; Pain; Recurrence


Cite and Share

Fatih Yanar,Aykhan Abbasov,Burak Ilhan,Berke Sengun,Beyza Ozcinar,Basak Erginel,Hakan Yanar. Is the combination of laser hemorrhoidoplasty and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy superior to conventional surgical techniques in terms of postoperative pain in hemorrhoid patients? A retrospective comparative analysis. Signa Vitae. 2024.doi:10.22514/sv.2024.135.

References

[1] Durgun C, Yiğit E. Laser hemorrhoidoplasty versus ligasure hemorrhoidectomy: a comparative analysis. Cureus. 2023; 15: e43119.

[2] Crea N, Pata G, Lippa M, Tamburini AM, Berjaoui AH. Hemorrhoid laser procedure (HeLP) for second- and third-degree hemorrhoids: results from a long-term follow-up analysis. Lasers in Medical Science. 2022; 37: 309–315.

[3] Dekker L, Han-Geurts IJM, Grossi U, Gallo G, Veldkamp R. Is the Goligher classification a valid tool in clinical practice and research for hemorrhoidal disease? Techniques in Coloproctology. 2022; 26: 387–392.

[4] Delgado DA, Lambert BS, Boutris N, McCulloch PC, Robbins AB, Moreno MR, et al. Validation of digital visual analog scale pain scoring with a traditional paper-based visual analog scale in adults. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global Research & Reviews. 2018; 2: e088.

[5] Cheng P, Chen C, Chen J, Wei P, Huang Y. Diode laser hemorrhoidoplasty versus conventional Milligan-Morgan and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for symptomatic hemorrhoids: meta-analysis. To be published in Asian Journal of Surgery. 2024. [Preprint].

[6] Jin L, Qin K, Wu R, Yang H, Cui C, Wang Z, et al. Laser hemorrhoidoplasty vs. rubber band ligation: a randomized trial comparing 2 mini-invasive treatment for grade II hemorrhoids. BMC Surgery. 2024; 24: 164.

[7] Hawkins AT, Davis BR, Bhama AR, Fang SH, Dawes AJ, Feingold DL, et al. The American society of colon and rectal surgeons clinical practice guidelines for the management of hemorrhoids. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 2024; 67: 614–623.

[8] Guenin M, Rosenthal R, Kern B, Peterli R, von Flüe M, Ackermann C. Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results and patient satisfaction after Ferguson’s hemorrhoidectomy. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 2005; 48: 1523–1527.

[9] Gerbershagen HJ, Aduckathil S, van Wijck AJ, Peelen LM, Kalkman CJ, Meissner W. Pain intensity on the first day after surgery: a prospective cohort study comparing 179 surgical procedures. Anesthesiology. 2013; 118: 934–944.

[10] Lehmann JP, Johansson HÖ, Graf W. Long-term functional results after excisional haemorrhoidectomy. Colorectal Disease. 2020; 22: 824–830.

[11] Gachabayov M, Angelos G, Orangio G, Abcarian H, Bergamaschi R; Hemorrhoids Study Group. Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy versus ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsed internal hemorrhoids: a multicenter prospective study. Annals of Surgery. 2023; 278: 376–382.

[12] Yuan XG, Wu J, Yin HM, Ma CM, Cheng SJ. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of different surgical procedures for patients with hemorrhoids: a network meta-analysis. Techniques in Coloproctology. 2023; 27: 799–811.

[13] Plapler H, Hage R, Duarte J, Lopes N, Masson I, Cazarini C, et al. A new method for hemorrhoid surgery: intrahemorrhoidal diode laser, does it work? Photomedicine and Laser Surgery. 2009; 27: 819–823.

[14] Nagdy MA. Comparative study between milligan morgan haemorrhoidectomy and laser ablation for the management of third and fourth degree of hemorrhoids. Al-Azhar International Medical Journal. 2022; 3: 49–58.

[15] Cemil A, Ugur K, Salih GM, Merve K, Guray DM, Emine BS. Comparison of laser hemorrhoidoplasty and milligan-morgan hemorrhoidectomy techniques in the treatment of grade 2 and 3 hemorrhoidal disease. The American Surgeon. 2024; 90: 662–671.

[16] Kwok SY, Chung CC, Tsui KK, Li MK. A double-blind, randomized trial comparing Ligasure and Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2005; 48: 344–348.

[17] Balciscueta Z, Balciscueta I, Uribe N. Post-hemorrhoidectomy pain: can surgeons reduce it? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 2021; 36: 2553–2566.

[18] Poskus T, Danys D, Makunaite G, Mainelis A, Mikalauskas S, Poskus E, et al. Results of the double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing laser hemorrhoidoplasty with sutured mucopexy and excisional hemorrhoidectomy. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 2020; 35: 481–490.

[19] Brusciano L, Gambardella C, Terracciano G, Gualtieri G, Schiano di Visconte M, Tolone S, et al. Postoperative discomfort and pain in the management of hemorrhoidal disease: laser hemorrhoidoplasty, a minimal invasive treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids. Updates in Surgery. 2020; 72: 851–857.

[20] Danys D, Pacevicius J, Makunaite G, Palubeckas R, Mainelis A, Markevicius N, et al. Tissue Coagulation in laser hemorrhoidoplasty—an experimental study. Open Medicine. 2020; 15: 185–189.

[21] He F, Zhang X, Lu D, Wang Z. Clinical efficacy of ultrasound doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation combined with procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids in treatment of severe hemorrhoids. Medicine. 2023; 102: e36189.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.

Index Copernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.3 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top