Article Data

  • Views 743
  • Dowloads 146

Original Research

Open Access

Comparison of systemic morphine, nalbuphine, and epidural analgesia on acute and chronic postoperative pain in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial

  • Yan Jiang1,†
  • Xiao-Long Liang1,†
  • Shu-Fang Sun1,†
  • Qi Chen1
  • Hong-Liang Liu1,*,

1Department of anesthesiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, 400030 Chongqing, China

DOI: 10.22514/sv.2024.124 Vol.20,Issue 10,October 2024 pp.38-46

Submitted: 25 December 2023 Accepted: 25 March 2024

Published: 08 October 2024

*Corresponding Author(s): Hong-Liang Liu E-mail: liuhl75@cqu.edu.cn

† These authors contributed equally.

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of diverse postoperative analgesic tech-niques in laparoscopic colorectal surgery and ascertain whether systemic administration of nalbuphine is a suitable alternative for this type of procedure. Sixty-nine patients suffering from colorectal cancer and undergoing laparoscopic surgery were randomly divided into three groups (n = 23, per group). Group R received patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with ropivacaine. Group M received patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) with morphine. Group N received PCIA with nalbuphine. Pain at rest (PAR), movement-evoked pain (MEP), stress hormone and any complications during the 72 hours after surgery were recorded. Additionally, chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) at 3 months and 6 months were also recorded. There was no significant difference in PAR among the 3 groups. However, patients in Group N had a higher intensity of MEP compared to those in Group R after surgery (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in CPSP at 6 months among the 3 groups (p > 0.05), but the incidence of CPSP at 3 months was higher in Group N (p = 0.01, as compared to Group R). The occurrences of pruritus and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were observed to be considerably greater in Group M as compared to the other two groups (p < 0.05). In conclusion, PCEA is more effective than PCIA with nalbuphine in reducing postoperative MEP and CPSP at 3 months after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. However, there was no significant difference between PCEA and PCIA with nalbuphine in reducing CPSP at 6 months. Although morphine and nalbuphine have the similar analgesic effects, morphine is associated with more side effects. Therefore, PCIA with nalbuphine might be a good option for patients who are not suitable for PCEA or have a high risk for PONV or pruritus.


Keywords

Postsurgical pain; Complication; Epidural analgesia; Nalbuphine; Morphine; Colorectal surgery


Cite and Share

Yan Jiang,Xiao-Long Liang,Shu-Fang Sun,Qi Chen,Hong-Liang Liu. Comparison of systemic morphine, nalbuphine, and epidural analgesia on acute and chronic postoperative pain in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Signa Vitae. 2024. 20(10);38-46.

References

[1] Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA CANCER J CLIN. 2018; 68: 394–424.

[2] Zheng RS, Zhang SW, Sun KX, Chen R, Wang SM, Li L, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2016. Chinese Journal of Oncology. 2023; 45: 212–220. (In Chinese)

[3] Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2024; 74: 12–49.

[4] Camiré D, Erb J, Kehlet H, Brennan T, Gilron I. Movement-evoked pain versus pain at rest in postsurgical clinical trials and meta-analyses: protocol for a follow-up systematic review. JMIR Research Protocols. 2020; 9: e15309.

[5] Lopes A, Seligman Menezes M, Antonio Moreira de Barros G. Chronic postoperative pain: ubiquitous and scarcely appraised: narrative review. Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology. 2021; 71: 649–655.

[6] Gómez M, Izquierdo CE, Mayoral Rojals V, Pergolizzi Jr J, Plancarte Sanchez R, Paladini A, et al. Considerations for better management of postoperative pain in light of chronic postoperative pain: a narrative review. Cureus. 2022; 14: e23763.

[7] Ishida Y, Okada T, Kobayashi T, Funatsu K, Uchino H. Pain management of acute and chronic postoperative pain. Cureus. 2022; 14: e23999.

[8] Pergolizzi JV, LeQuang JA, Magnusson P, Varrassi G. Identifying risk factors for chronic postsurgical pain and preventive measures: a comprehensive update. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics. 2023; 23: 1297–1310.

[9] Shawqi M, Mohamed SA, Hetta D. Could epidural analgesia be safely used for acute postoperative pain in older adults to enhance recovery? Journal of Perioperative Practice. 2024; 34: 39–46.

[10] Khudair HA, Ramadan M, Obaid A, Yousef O, Sammour R. Prevalence of chronic postsurgical pain among cancer patients: a cross-sectional study. Anesthesia: Essays and Researches. 2022; 16: 71.

[11] Jiang Q, Zhang R, and Liu T. Effect of nalbuphine on patient controlled intravenous analgesia after radical resection of colon cancer. Oncology Letters. 2020; 19: 2533–2538.

[12] Yang L, Wu J, Li T. The application of nalbuphine in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for patients undergoing subtotal gastrectomy. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. 2017; 15: 1910–1913.

[13] Zhou W, Wang J, Hu C, Dai F, Zhang Z, Li C, et al. Analgesic effects of different κ-receptor agonists used in daytime laparoscopic cholecystectomy. BioMed Research International. 2021; 2021: 2396008.

[14] Liu X, Hu J, Hu X, Li R, Li Y, Wong G, et al. Preemptive intravenous nalbuphine for the treatment of post-operative visceral pain: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Pain and Therapy. 2021; 10: 1155–1169.

[15] Salicath JH, Yeoh EC, Bennett MH. Epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for pain following intra-abdominal surgery in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2018; 8: CD010434.

[16] Shiras, P, Ninave, S, Ninave, S. Pharmacological features, therapeutic efficacy and side effects of nalbuphine: a review. Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International. 2021; 33: 54–63.

[17] Salicath JH, Yeoh ECY, Bennett MH. Epidural analgesia versus patient‐controlled intravenous analgesia for pain following intra‐abdominal surgery in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2018, 8: CD010434.

[18] Srikandarajah S, Gilron I. Systematic review of movement-evoked pain versus pain at rest in postsurgical clinical trials and meta-analyses: a fundamental distinction requiring standardized measurement. Pain. 2011; 152: 1734–1739.

[19] Jin J, Chen Q, Min S, Du X, Zhang D, Qin P. Prevalence and predictors of chronic postsurgical pain after colorectal surgery: a prospective study. Colorectal Disease. 2021; 23: 1878–1889.

[20] Jannuzzi RG. Nalbuphine for treatment of opioid-induced pruritus. The Clinical Journal of Pain. 2016; 32: 87–93.

[21] Tubog TD, Harenberg JL, Buszta K, Hestand JD. Prophylactic nalbuphine to prevent neuraxial opioid-induced pruritus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing. 2019; 34: 491–501.e8.

[22] Herndon CM, Jackson KC, Hallin PA. Management of opioid‐induced gastrointestinal effects in patients receiving palliative care. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. 2002; 22: 240–250.

[23] Imam MZ, Kuo A, Ghassabian S, Smith MT. Progress in understanding mechanisms of opioid-induced gastrointestinal adverse effects and respiratory depression. Neuropharmacology. 2018; 131: 238–255.

[24] Zeng Z, Lu J, Shu C, Chen Y, Guo T, Wu QP, et al. A comparison of nalbuphine with morphine for analgesic effects and safety: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Scientific Reports. 2015; 5: 10927.

[25] Guay J, Nishimori M, Kopp SL. Epidural local anesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens for postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, vomiting, and pain after abdominal surgery. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2016; 123: 1591–1602.

[26] Chen J, Tian L, Zhang L, Hu J, Huang S, Jiao J. Nalbuphine on postoperative gastrointestinal tract dysfunction after laparoscopic surgery for gynaecological malignancies: a randomized controlled trial. Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology. 2021; 48: 170–176.

[27] Hübner M, Blanc C, Roulin D, Winiker M, Gander S, Demartines N. Randomized clinical trial on epidural versus patient-controlled analgesia for laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery pathway. Annals of Surgery. 2015; 261: 648–653.

[28] Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M, Nygren J, Demartines N, Francis N, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colorectal surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (eras®) society recommendations: 2018. World Journal of Surgery. 2019; 43: 659–695.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.

Index Copernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.3 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top