Article Data

  • Views 1680
  • Dowloads 162

Original Research

Open Access

Diagnostic value of tearing pain alone in aortic dissection

  • Erdinç Şengüldür1
  • Kudret Selki1
  • Mehmet C. Demir1,*,
  • Hatice Güldal1

1Department of Emergency Medicine, Duzce University, 81620 Duzce, Turkey

DOI: 10.22514/sv.2024.095 Vol.20,Issue 8,August 2024 pp.27-31

Submitted: 04 January 2024 Accepted: 27 February 2024

Published: 08 August 2024

*Corresponding Author(s): Mehmet C. Demir E-mail: mehmetcihatdemir@duzce.edu.tr

Abstract

Severe and sudden chest or back pain that feels like tearing is the most common symptom of aortic dissection. This study aimed to investigate if chest or abdominal pain alone is a marker of aortic dissection and to determine its patient characteristics. This was a retrospective, single-center observational study. It was conducted in the emergency department (ED) of a tertiary university hospital in Turkey. During three years, patients admitted to the ED and underwent contrast-enhanced thoracic and abdominal computed tomography angiography (CTA) were detected through the hospital computer system. Patients with tearing chest or abdominal pain at admission were identified. Patients with and without aortic dissection were compared based on gender, triage code, comorbidity, aortic aneurysm, and one-month mortality. 76.3% (n = 730) out of 957 CTAs were performed due to complaints of tearing chest or abdominal pain. Aortic dissection was detected in 4.5% (n = 33) of patients with tearing pain. Pre-existing aortic aneurysm was statistically significantly higher in the dissection group (p < 0.001). When the chest or abdominal pain and CTA findings regarding the presence of aortic dissection were compared, the sensitivity of tearing pain was 84.62%, and the specificity was 24.07%. The positive predictive value of tearing pain was 4.52%, and the negative predictive value was 97.36%. In conclusion, the negative predictive value of tearing pain for aortic dissection was approximately 97%. This severe pain raises the possibility of aortic dissection. However, aortic dissection is only detected in a small percentage of cases in CTAs performed immediately to confirm the diagnosis.


Keywords

Aortic dissection; Tearing pain; Computed tomography angiography; Emergency department


Cite and Share

Erdinç Şengüldür,Kudret Selki,Mehmet C. Demir,Hatice Güldal. Diagnostic value of tearing pain alone in aortic dissection. Signa Vitae. 2024. 20(8);27-31.

References

[1] Khaja MS, Williams DM. Aortic dissection: introduction. Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 2021; 24: 100745.

[2] Della Corte A, Michelena HI, Citarella A, Votta E, Piatti F, Presti FL, et al. Risk stratification in bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy: emerging evidence and future perspectives. Current Problems in Cardiology. 2021; 46: 100428.

[3] Pape LA, Awais M, Woznicki EM, Suzuki T, Trimarchi S, Evangelista A, et al. Presentation, diagnosis, and outcomes of acute aortic dissection: 17-year trends from the international registry of acute aortic dissection. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2015; 66: 350–358.

[4] Murillo H, Molvin L, Chin AS, Fleischmann D. Aortic dissection and other acute aortic syndromes: diagnostic imaging findings from acute to chronic longitudinal progression. Radiographics. 2021; 41: 425–446.

[5] Teasdale A. Dissecting the medical student approach to chest pain: a cross-sectional study focusing on aortic dissection. Cureus. 2022; 14: e29050.

[6] Evangelista A, Isselbacher EM, Bossone E, Gleason TG, Eusanio MD, Sechtem U, et al. Insights from the international registry of acute aortic dissection: a 20-year experience of collaborative clinical research. Circulation. 2018; 137: 1846–1860.

[7] Morello F, Santoro M, Fargion AT, Grifoni S, Nazerian P. Diagnosis and management of acute aortic syndromes in the emergency department. Internal and Emergency Medicine. 2021; 16: 171–181.

[8] Modares M, Hanneman K, Ouzounian M, Chung J, Nguyen ET. Computed tomography angiography assessment of acute aortic syndromes: classification, differentiating imaging features, and imaging interpretation pitfalls. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal. 2022; 73: 228–239.

[9] Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black Iii J, Augoustides JG, Beck AW, Bolen MA, et al. 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: a report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2022; 80: e223–e393.

[10] DeBakey ME, Beall AC Jr, Cooley DA, Crawford ES, Morris GC Jr, Garrett HE, et al. Dissecting aneurysms of the aorta. Surgical Clinics of North America. 1966; 46: 1045–1055.

[11] Hartrick CT, Kovan JP, Shapiro S. The numeric rating scale for clinical pain measurement: a ratio measure? Pain Practice. 2003; 3: 310–316.

[12] Nappi F, Gambardella I, Singh SSA, Salsano A, Santini F, Spadaccio C, et al. Survival following acute type A aortic dissection: a multicenter study. Journal of Thoracic Disease. 2023; 15: 6604–6622.

[13] Harris KM, Nienaber CA, Peterson MD, Woznicki EM, Braverman AC, Trimarchi S, et al. Early mortality in type A acute aortic dissection. JAMA Cardiology. 2022; 7: 1009–1015.

[14] Hibino M, Verma S, Jarret CM, Shimamura J, Verma R, Hibino H, et al. Temporal trends in mortality of aortic dissection and rupture in the UK, Japan, the USA and Canada. Heart. 2024; 110: 331–336.

[15] Silaschi M, Byrne J, Wendler O. Aortic dissection: medical, interventional and surgical management. Heart. 2017; 103: 78–87.

[16] Zhu Y, Lingala B, Baiocchi M, Tao JJ, Toro Arana V, Khoo JW, et al. Type A aortic dissection-experience over 5 decades: JACC historical breakthroughs in perspective. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2020; 76: 1703–1713.

[17] Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2005; 14: 798–804.

[18] Fosnocht DE, Chapman CR, Swanson ER, Donaldson GW. Correlation of change in visual analog scale with pain relief in the ED. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2005; 23: 55–59.

[19] Januzzi JL, Isselbacher EM, Fattori R, Cooper JV, Smith DE, Fang J, et al. Characterizing the young patient with aortic dissection: results from the international registry of aortic dissection (IRAD). Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2004; 43: 665–669.

[20] Sutarjono B, Ahmed AJ, Ivanova A, Buchel B, Rauscher J, O’Connell A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of transthoracic echocardiography for the identification of proximal aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports. 2023; 13: 5886.

[21] Buchel B, Sutarjono B, Grewal E. Type A aortic dissection identified by point-of-care ultrasound but missed by CT angiogram. BMJ Case Reports. 2023; 16: e253577.

[22] Liu F, Huang L. Usefulness of ultrasound in the management of aortic dissection. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2018; 19: 103–109.

[23] Demir MC, Akkas M. Awareness of risks associated with the use of plain X-Ray, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging among emergency physicians and comparison with that of other physicians: a survey from Turkey. Medical Science Monitor. 2019; 25: 6587–6597.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.

Index Copernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.3 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top