Article Menu

Export Article

More by Authors Links

Article Data

  • Views 1188
  • Dowloads 150

Original Research

Open Access

Differences in the determination of manner of death for death certificates by physicians in South Korea: questionnaire survey

  • Ji Yeon Lim1
  • Duk Hee Lee2,*,

1Department of Emergency Medicine, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, 07804 Seoul, Republic of Korea

2Department of Emergency Medicine, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, 07985 Seoul, Republic of Korea

DOI: 10.22514/sv.2023.079 Vol.19,Issue 6,November 2023 pp.95-103

Submitted: 02 February 2023 Accepted: 28 March 2023

Published: 08 November 2023

*Corresponding Author(s): Duk Hee Lee E-mail: calla@ewha.ac.kr

PDF (694.92 kB) Supplementary material View Full-text

Abstract

In South Korea, the manner and cause of death are determined by physicians. The present study aimed to investigate the differences in decisions made by physicians when completing death certificates and the factors that lead to these differences in South Korea. Questionnaires were used to survey 210 physicians who routinely complete death certificates, and demographic data along with information on their decisions regarding the manner and cause of death as well as natural and unnatural contributory causes were ascertained for eight representative cases. The study sample comprised 149 (71.0%) and 61 (29.0%) male and female physicians, respectively, and the mean age in this sample was 36.93 ± 4.51 years. We found that 64.7%, 61.4%, 7.6%, 4.3%, 4.3%, 65.7%, 84.3%and 53.3% of the physicians considered cases 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 as unnatural deaths, respectively, while 27.6%, 32.0%, 91.9%, 95%, 8.5%, 26.6%, 6.7% and 38.1%considered them to be natural deaths, respectively. In Case 5, 81.7% considered death to be due to an indeterminate cause. We found that differences may exist in how physicians select the manner of death when completing a death certificate and that this decision is influenced by several factors.


Keywords

Cause of death certification; Death certificate; Manner of death certificate


Cite and Share

Ji Yeon Lim,Duk Hee Lee. Differences in the determination of manner of death for death certificates by physicians in South Korea: questionnaire survey. Signa Vitae. 2023. 19(6);95-103.

URL:

https://www.signavitae.com/articles/10.22514/sv.2023.079

References

[1] Brooks EG, Reed KD. Principles and pitfalls: a guide to death certification. Clinical Medicine & Research. 2015; 13: 74–82.

[2] Mieno MN, Tanaka N, Arai T, Kawahara T, Kuchiba A, Ishikawa S, et al. Accuracy of death certificates and assessment of factors for misclassification of underlying cause of death. Journal of Epidemiology. 2016; 26: 191–198.

[3] Kim KS, Lim YS, Rhee JE, Suh GJ, Youn YK, Eo EK, et al. Problems in completing a death certificate. Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine. 2000; 11: 443–449.

[4] Yoon SH, KIM R, LEE CS. Analysis of death certificate errors of a university hospital emergency room. Korean Journal of Legal Medicine. 2017; 41: 61–66.

[5] Dash SK, Behera BK, Patro S. Accuracy in certification of cause of death in a tertiary care hospital—a retrospective analysis. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 2014; 24: 33–36.

[6] Kim H, Park J, Cho W, Seo J, Choi C, Na J. The discrepancy of the cause and manner of death between death certificates and autopsy reports. Korean Journal of Legal Medicine. 2014; 38: 139.

[7] Shin H, Lee S. How to write a death certificate: from a statistical point of view. Journal of the Korean Medical Association. 2018; 61: 268.

[8] Kang E, Lee H, Kim SH. The effect of education on ‘how to write the death certificate’ for resident trainees of the emergency department. Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine. 2018; 29: 529–550.

[9] Kim M, Lee SD. A proposal for writing a better death certificate. Journal of the Korean Medical Association. 2018; 61: 259.

[10] Lee H-J, Lee S-H. Inappropriateness in completing a death certificate. Journal of Forensic and Investigative Science. 2008; 3: 43–49.

[11] Association KM. How to write and issue medical certificates. Korean Medical Association: Seoul. 2015.

[12] Park WS, Lee MY, Lee MS, Yoon SC, Lee YS, Seo SW, et al. A study on the evaluation of the quality of death statistics and its improvement methods. Dankook University Medical College Health Promotion Agency Funds. 2003; 42–43.

[13] Legislation, K.M.o.G. Medical Service Act. Article 17 (medical certificates, etc.). Available at: http://www.law.go.kr/lsInfoP.do?lsiSeq=183558&urlMode=engLsInfoR&viewCls= engLsInfoR" (Accessed: 29 May 2016).

[14] Lim JY, Yang KM, Lee DH. Study on death certificates and postmortem examination certificates written by Korean emergency physicians. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 2020; 72: 101960.

[15] Lu T, Shih T, Lee M, Chou M, Lin C. Diversity in death certification. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2001; 54: 1086–1093.

[16] Roberts ISD. What is a natural cause of death? A survey of how coroners in England and Wales approach borderline cases. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2000; 53: 367–373.

[17] Lu T, Kwok C, Ho L. Whether to report diabetes as the underlying cause-of-death? A survey of internists of different sub-specialties. BMC Endocrine Disorders. 2010; 10: 13.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.

Index Copernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top