Real-time ultrasound-guided vs. anatomical landmark-guided paramedian epidural anesthesia in overweight parturients undergoing analgesic labor: a randomized controlled trial
1Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The First Aﬃliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 210029 Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
DOI: 10.22514/sv.2021.218 Vol.17,Issue 6,November 2021 pp.66-73
Submitted: 01 August 2021 Accepted: 28 September 2021
Published: 08 November 2021
We evaluated whether real-time ultrasound-guided epidural block is more suitable for overweight parturients undergoing analgesic labor than traditional palpation positioning. Sixty overweight at-term pregnant women (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2) with singleton pregnancy, prepared for vaginal delivery with epidural analgesia, were randomly allocated into two groups. The parturients in the anatomical landmark catheterization group received paramedian epidural anesthesia using the anatomical landmark-guided technique, while real-time ultrasound-guided positioning was performed in the ultrasound-guided-catheterization group. Total procedure duration, time to identify the puncture site and perform the puncture, first attempt success rate, number of attempts, number of needle-redirections, intervertebral-space-change rate, satisfaction score, and complications were compared between the groups. Procedure duration and time to identify the puncture site were significantly shorter in the anatomical landmark catheterization group (440.1 ± 97.2 s vs. 521.9 ± 68.4 s, p < 0.001 and 24.9 ± 13.6 s vs. 112.2 ± 15.6 s, p < 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in the time to perform the puncture (385.3 ± 89.7 s vs. 365.1 ± 73.0 s, p = 0.341). The first attempt success rate was lower while the number of attempts and number of needle-redirections were higher in the anatomical landmark catheterization group (p < 0.05). The intervertebral-space-change rate was similar across the groups. Satisfaction was significantly lower in the ultrasound-guided catheterization group (p = 0.009). Complication occurrence, e.g., catheterization difficulty or bleeding during catheterization, dural puncture, and lower-back pain, was similar across the groups. Real-time ultrasound-guided paramedian epidural anesthesia improved the first attempt success rate and reduced the number of attempts and number of needle-redirections in overweight parturients undergoing analgesic labor. However, the longer total procedure duration and time to identify the puncture site might dissatisfy parturients.
Real-time ultrasound-guided; Paramedian epidural block; Overweight; Parturients; Analgesic labor
Jindi Jiang,Yujie Xu,Mingfeng He. Real-time ultrasound-guided vs. anatomical landmark-guided paramedian epidural anesthesia in overweight parturients undergoing analgesic labor: a randomized controlled trial. Signa Vitae. 2021. 17(6);66-73.
 Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Flegal KM. Prevalence of obesity among adults and youth: United States, 2011–2014. NCHS Data Brief. 2015; 1–8.
 Taylor CR, Dominguez JE, Habib AS. Obesity and obstetric anesthesia: current insights. Local and Regional Anesthesia. 2019; 12: 111–124.
 Buddeberg BS, Bandschapp O, Girard T. Post-dural puncture headache. Minerva Anestesiologica. 2019; 85.
 Mace HS, Paech MJ, Mcdonnell NJ. Obesity and Obstetric Anaesthesia. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. 2011; 39: 559–570.
 Grau T, Leipold RW, Fatehi S, Martin E, Motsch J. Real-time ultrasonic observation of combined spinal–epidural anaesthesia. European Journal of Anaesthesiology. 2004; 21: 25–31.
 Grau T, Leipold RW, Horter J, Conradi R, Martin E, Motsch J. The lumbar epidural space in pregnancy: visualization by ultrasonography. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2001; 86: 798–804.
 Nassar M, Abdelazim IA. Pre-puncture ultrasound guided epidural insertion before vaginal delivery. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing. 2015; 29: 573–577.
 Li H, Kang Y, Jin L, Ma D, Liu Y, Wang Y. Feasibility of ultrasound-guided lumbar epidural access using paramedian transverse scanning with the needle in-plane: a comparison with paramedian sagittal scanning. Journal of Anesthesia. 2020; 34: 29–35.
 Park S, Yoo S, Kim WH, Lim Y, Bahk J, Kim J. Ultrasound-assisted vs. landmark-guided paramedian spinal anaesthesia in the elderly: A randomised controlled trial. European Journal of Anaesthesiology. 2019; 36: 763–771.
 Debiec J, Conell-Price J, Evansmith J, Shafer SL, Flood P. Mathematical modeling of the pain and progress of the first stage of nulliparous labor. Anesthesiology. 2009; 111: 1093–1110.
 Polónia Valente R, Santos P, Ferraz T, Montenegro N, Rodrigues T. Effect of obesity on labor duration among nulliparous women with epidural analgesia. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2020; 33: 2195–2201.
 Shmueli A, Salman L, Orbach-Zinger S, Aviram A, Hiersch L, Chen R, et al. The impact of epidural analgesia on the duration of the second stage of labor. Birth. 2018; 45: 377–384.
 Poma S, Scudeller L, Verga C, Mirabile G, Gardella B, Broglia F, et al. Effects of combined spinal–epidural analgesia on first stage of labor: a cohort study. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2019; 32: 3559–3565.
 Luo Y, Zhang D, Zheng J, Yang Q, An X, Chen Y, et al. Suitable depth of epidural puncture in nulliparous pregnant woman. Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics. 2015; 71: 875–880.
 Vallejo MC, Phelps AL, Singh S, Orebaugh SL, Sah N. Ultrasound decreases the failed labor epidural rate in resident trainees. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. 2010; 19: 373–378.
 Grau T, Leipold R, Conradi R, Martin E, Motsch J. Ultrasonography and peridural anesthesia. Technical possibilities and limitations of ultrasonic examination of the epidural space. Der Anaesthesist. 2001; 50: 94–101.
 Lim YC, Choo CY, Tan KTJ. A randomised controlled trial of ultrasound-assisted spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. 2014; 42: 191–198.
 Wang Y, Ying H, Zhang W, He R, Lin J. Application of ultrasound-guided epidural catheter indwelling in painless labour. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association. 2020; 70: 45–50.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.
IndexCopernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.
Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.
Scopus: CiteScore 0.5(2019) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.