Article Data

  • Views 811
  • Dowloads 151

Original Research

Open Access Special Issue

Survival analysis in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with shockable rhythm directly transport to Heart Centers

  • Chung-Cheng Yeh1,2,†
  • Chia-Hau Chang1,2,3,†
  • Chen-June Seak1,3
  • Chen-Bin Chen1,3
  • Yi-Ming Weng1,4
  • Chi-Chun Lin1,5
  • Chien-Hsiung Huang1
  • Hsiao-Jung Tseng6
  • Chip-Jin Ng1
  • Li-Heng Tsai1

1Department of Emergency Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, 333 Tao-Yuan, Taiwan

2Department of Emergency Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung Branch, Taiwan

3Department of Emergency Medicine, New Taipei Municipal Tucheng Hospital, 236 New Taipei City, Taiwan

4Department of Emergency Medicine, Taoyuan General Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, 33004 Taoyuan, Taiwan

5Department of Emergency Medicine, Ton-Yen General Hospital, 302 Zhubei, Taiwan

6Biostatistical Unit, Clinical Trial Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 333 Linkou, Taiwan

DOI: 10.22514/sv.2021.084 Vol.17,Issue 5,September 2021 pp.95-102

Submitted: 12 March 2021 Accepted: 29 March 2021

Published: 08 September 2021

*Corresponding Author(s): Li-Heng Tsai E-mail: lihan0509@gmail.com

† These authors contributed equally.

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate whether out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients with initial shockable rhythm without prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) who are directly transported to Heart Centers in appropriate time will have better post-cardiac arrest four months survival and neurological outcomes at discharge.

Methods: This retrospective study assessed the data of 1,588 OHCA patients with shockable rhythm and without prehospital ROSC collected from the registry database of Taoyuan City between January 2014 and June 2018. The relationships of transport time to Heart Centers with survival at discharge and with neurological outcomes were investigated for survival analysis.

Results: Among the 1,588 OHCA patients with initial shockable rhythm and without prehospital ROSC, 1,222 (77.0%) and 366 (23.0%) were transported to Heart Centers and non-Heart Centers, respectively. However, the transport to Heart Centers was associated with an increased survival at discharge (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.00, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42–2.81) and good neurological outcomes (cerebral performance category [CPC] 1 and 2) (aOR 3.14, 95% CI, 1.88–5.23), regardless of the transport time. The overall mortality reduction for Heart Centers was 39% (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.61; 95% CI 0.47–0.78), compared to that for non-Heart Centers. At 120 days of follow-up, the results showed a higher survival rate for patients who were transported to Heart Centers within a short time. The percentages of good CPC showed a better distribution for non-Heart Centers versus those for Heart Centers.

Conclusions: Adult OHCA patients with initial shockable rhythm and without prehospital ROSC who were transported to Heart Centers directly had better post-cardiac arrest survival and good neurologic outcomes, regardless of the transport time.


Keywords

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; Heart Centers; Transport time; Survival at discharge


Cite and Share

Chung-Cheng Yeh,Chia-Hau Chang,Chen-June Seak,Chen-Bin Chen,Yi-Ming Weng,Chi-Chun Lin,Chien-Hsiung Huang,Hsiao-Jung Tseng,Chip-Jin Ng,Li-Heng Tsai. Survival analysis in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with shockable rhythm directly transport to Heart Centers. Signa Vitae. 2021. 17(5);95-102.

References

[1] Nichol G, Thomas E, Callaway CW, Hedges J, Powell JL, Aufderheide TP, et al. Regional variation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence and outcome. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2008; 300: 1423–1431.

[2] Hasegawa K, Tsugawa Y, Camargo CA Jr, Hiraide A, Brown DFM. Regional variability in survival outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the all-Japan Utstein Registry. Resuscitation. 2013; 84: 1099–1107.

[3] Hu S. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in an oriental metropolitan city. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 1994; 12: 491–494.

[4] Sulzgruber P, Sterz F, Schober A, Uray T, Van Tulder R, Hubner P, et al. Editor’s Choice-Progress in the chain of survival and its impact on outcomes of patients admitted to a specialized high-volume cardiac arrest center during the past two decades. European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care. 2016; 5: 3–12.

[5] Cummins RO. Emergency medical services and sudden cardiac arrest: the “chain of survival” concept. Annual Review of Public Health. 1993; 14: 313–333.

[6] Cummins RO, Ornato JP, Thies WH, Pepe PE. Improving survival from sudden cardiac arrest: the “chain of survival” concept. A statement for health professionals from the Advanced Cardiac Life Support Subcommittee and the Emergency Cardiac Care Committee, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1991; 83: 1832–1847.

[7] Chien C, Fang S, Tsai L, Tsai S, Chen C, Seak C, et al. Traditional versus blended CPR training program: a randomized controlled non-inferiority study. Scientific Reports. 2020; 10: 10032.

[8] Wang M, Wu Y, Chien C, Tsai L, Chen C, Seak C, et al. Learning effectiveness assessment between primary school students and adults in basic life support education. Emergency Medicine International. 2021; 2021: 5579402.

[9] Sasson C, Rogers MAM, Dahl J, Kellermann AL. Predictors of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 2010; 3: 63–81.

[10] Li Q, Goodman SG, Yan RT, Gore JM, Polasek P, Lai K, et al. Pre-hospital cardiac arrest in acute coronary syndromes: insights from the global registry of acute coronary events and the Canadian registry of acute coronary events. Cardiology. 2013; 126: 27–34.

[11] Lin Y, Chang S, Wang L, Chi H, Ueng K, Tsai C, et al. Prehospital predictors of initial shockable rhythm in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: findings from the Taichung Sudden Unexpected Death Registry (THUN-DER). Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2017; 92: 347–359.

[12] Martínez-Losas P, Salinas P, Ferrera C, Nogales-Romo MT, Noriega F, Trigo MD, et al. Coronary angiography findings in cardiac arrest patients with non-diagnostic post-resuscitation electrocardiogram: a comparison of shockable and non-shockable initial rhythms. World Journal of Cardiology. 2017; 9: 702–709.

[13] Ewy GA, Bobrow BJ. Cardiocerebral resuscitation: an approach to improving survival of patients with primary cardiac arrest. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine. 2016; 31: 24–33.

[14] Nolan JP, Soar J, Cariou A, Cronberg T, Moulaert VRM, Deakin CD, et al. European resuscitation council and european society of intensive care medicine guidelines for post-resuscitation care 2015: section 5 of the European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015. Resuscitation. 2015; 95: 202–222.

[15] Schober A, Sterz F, Laggner AN, Poppe M, Sulzgruber P, Lobmeyr E, et al. Admission of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims to a high volume cardiac arrest center is linked to improved outcome. Resuscitation. 2016; 106: 42–48.

[16] Søholm H, Kjaergaard J, Bro-Jeppesen J, Hartvig-Thomsen J, Lippert F, Køber L, et al. Prognostic implications of level-of-care at tertiary heart centers compared with other hospitals after resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 2015; 8: 268–276.

[17] McKenzie N, Williams TA, Ho KM, Inoue M, Bailey P, Celenza A, et al. Direct transport to a PCI-capable hospital is associated with improved survival after adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of medical aetiology. Resuscitation. 2018; 128: 76–82.

[18]

Chien C, Tsai S, Tsai L, Chen C, Seak C, Weng Y, et al. Impact of transport time and cardiac arrest centers on the neurological outcome after out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective cohort study. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2020; 9: e015544.

[19] Kragholm K, Malta Hansen C, Dupre ME, Xian Y, Strauss B, Tyson C, et al. Direct transport to a percutaneous cardiac intervention center and outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 2017; 10: e003414.

[20] Elmer J, Callaway CW, Chang CH, Madaras J, Martin-Gill C, Nawrocki P, et al. Long-term outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest care at regionalized centers. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2019; 73: 29–39.

[21] Han KS, Lee SW, Lee EJ, Kim SJ. Prognostic value of the conversion to a shockable rhythm in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with initial non-shockable rhythm. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2019; 8: 644.

[22] Geri G, Gilgan J, Wu W, Vijendira S, Ziegler C, Drennan IR, et al. Does transport time of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients matter? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2017; 115: 96–101.

[23] Tsai S, Chaou C, Huang C, Tzeng I, Kuo C, Weng Y, et al. Features of hospital and emergency medical service in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with shockable rhythm. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2017; 35: 1222–1227.

[24] Vyas A, Chan PS, Cram P, Nallamothu BK, McNally B, Girotra S. Early coronary angiography and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2015; 8: e002321.

[25] Garcia S, Drexel T, Bekwelem W, Raveendran G, Caldwell E, Hodgson L, et al. Early access to the cardiac catheterization laboratory for patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest due to a shockable rhythm: the minnesota resuscitation consortium twin cities unified protocol. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2016; 5: e002670.

[26] Kern KB, Lotun K, Patel N, Mooney MR, Hollenbeck RD, McPherson JA, et al. Outcomes of comatose cardiac arrest survivors with and without ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: importance of coronary angiography. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2015; 8: 1031–1040.

[27] Edgren E, Hedstrand U, Kelsey S, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Safar P. Assessment of neurological prognosis in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. BRCT I Study Group. Lancet. 1994; 343: 1055–1059.

[28] Kajino K, Iwami T, Daya M, Nishiuchi T, Hayashi Y, Kitamura T, et al. Impact of transport to critical care medical centers on outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2010; 81: 549–554.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.

IndexCopernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.

Scopus: CiteScore 0.5(2019) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top