Influence of rescuer strength and shift cycle time on chest compression quality
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Gyeonggido, Korea
2 Department of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
DOI: 10.22514/SV131.052017.29 Vol.13,Issue 1,March 2017 pp.70-74
Published: 20 March 2017
Introduction. Previous studies have sug-gested that differences in rescuer strength and compression shift cycle are strongly associated with the quality of chest com-pression. We hypothesised that changing the shift cycle from two minutes to one would have a positive effect on the qual-ity of chest compression in two-rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), re-gardless of rescuer strength.
Methods.Thirty-nine senior medical stu-dents participated in this prospective, simulation-based, crossover study. Af-ter evaluation of muscle strength using a handgrip dynamometer, each participant was required to perform two sets of com-pressions separated by a 15-minute rest. Participants started with either four cycles of chest compressions for one minute fol-lowed by a one-minute rest (1-MCS), or with two cycles of chest compressions for two minutes followed by a two-minute rest (2-MCS). After a 15-minute break, participants switched groups and per-formed the other set of compressions. Mean compression depth (MCD), mean adequate compression (MAC), and ade-quate compression ratio (ACR) per minute were measured for each group. Subjective fatigue was reported after the completion of each set of compression cycles. Results. Rescuer strength was strongly correlated with MCD (p <0.01), MAC ratio (p <0.01), and ACR (p <0.01), and cycle group was correlated with MCD (p <0.01) and ACR (p =0.03). Subjective fatigue with 1-MCS was lower than with 2-MCS, regardless of rescuer strength.
Conclusion. We found that the quality of chest compressions could be improved by changing the shift cycle from two min-utes to one, regardless of rescuer strength. Therefore, reducing the existing shift cycle recommended in guidelines for two rescu-ers could be beneficial.
CPR, fatigue, hand strength
HYUNJONG KIM,JE SUNG YOU,SUNG PHIL CHUNG. Influence of rescuer strength and shift cycle time on chest compression quality. Signa Vitae. 2017. 13(1);70-74.
1. Kleinman ME, Brennan EE, Goldberger ZD, Swor RA, Terry M, Bobrow BJ, et al. Part 5: Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopul-monary Resuscitation Quality: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emer-gency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015;132(18 Suppl 2):S414-35.
2. Perkins GD, Handley AJ, Koster RW, Castren M, Smyth MA, Olasveengen T, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 2. Adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation. Resuscitation 2015;95:81-99.
3. Ashton A, McCluskey A, Gwinnutt CL, Keenan AM. Effect of rescuer fatigue on performance of continuous external chest compres-sions over 3 min. Resuscitation 2002;55(2):151-5.
4. Heidenreich JW, Berg RA, Higdon TA, Ewy GA, Kern KB, Sanders AB. Rescuer fatigue: standard versus continuous chest-com-pression cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine 2006;13(10):1020-6.
5. Hightower D, Thomas SH, Stone CK, Dunn K, March JA. Decay in quality of closed-chest compressions over time. Ann Em Med 1995;26(3):300-3.
6. Ochoa FJ, Ramalle-Gomara E, Lisa V, Saralegui I. The effect of rescuer fatigue on the quality of chest compressions. Resuscitation 1998;37(3):149-52.
7. Hansen D, Vranckx P, Broekmans T, Eijnde BO, Beckers W, Vandekerckhove P, et al. Physical fitness affects the quality of single operator cardiocerebral resuscitation in healthcare professionals. European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine 2012;19(1):28-34.
8. Ock SM, Kim YM, Chung J, Kim SH. Influence of physical fitness on the performance of 5-minute continuous chest compression. European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine 2011;18(5):251-6.
9. Russo SG, Neumann P, Reinhardt S, Timmermann A, Niklas A, Quintel M, et al. Impact of physical fitness and biometric data on the quality of external chest compression: a randomised, crossover trial. BMC Em Med 2011;11:20.
10. Bassey EJ, Harries UJ. Normal values for handgrip strength in 920 men and women aged over 65 years, and longitudinal changes over 4 years in 620 survivors. Clin Sci 1993;84(3):331-7.
11. Machover S. Relationship of muscle strength of back and upper extremity with level of physical activity in healthy women. American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation / Association of Academic Physiatrists. 1989;68(6):300-1.
12. Milliken LA, Faigenbaum AD, Loud RL, Westcott WL. Correlates of upper and lower body muscular strength in children. Journal of strength and conditioning research / National Strength & Conditioning Association. 2008;22(4):1339-46.
13. Foo NP, Chang JH, Lin HJ, Guo HR. Rescuer fatigue and cardiopulmonary resuscitation positions: A randomized controlled crosso-ver trial. Resuscitation 2010;81(5):579-84.
14. Pozner CN, Almozlino A, Elmer J, Poole S, McNamara D, Barash D. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation feedback improves the quality of chest compression provided by hospital health care professionals. Am J Em Med 2011;29(6):618-25.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.
IndexCopernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.
Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.
Scopus: CiteScore 0.5(2019) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.