Rescuer fatigue does not correlate to energy expenditure during simulated basic life support
1 Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
2 Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, J.E. Purkinje University, Masaryk Hospital, Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic
3 Emergency Medical Service of the Central Bohemian Region, Beroun, Czech Republic
4 Hradec Kralove Region Emergency Medical Services, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
5 1st Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Sports Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech republic
6 6Department of Anesthesia, Pain Management and Perioperative Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
7 Department of Research and Development and Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
DOI: 10.22514/SV121.102016.10 Vol.12,Issue S1,October 2016 pp.58-62
Published: 10 October 2016
port (BLS) may be limited by the physical capabilities of rescuers. The other factor that may affect BLS quality is its energy ex-penditure. Therefore, we decided to com-pare the energy expenditure of standard BLS with a compression-ventilation ratio of 30:2 (S-BLS) and compression-only BLS (CO-BLS) and assess the sensation of fatigue and perceived exertion associated with these activities.
Methods. We conducted a simulation study on 10 healthy volunteers using a resuscita-tion manikin. Participants were randomly assigned to start with CO-BLS or with S-BLS, in accordance with recent guidelines. Later, every individual provided the other type of BLS. BLS was terminated in the event of exhaustion, impossibility to re-tain high-quality BLS or after 30 minutes of BLS. Energy expenditure was expressed as relative oxygen consumption (VO2/kg) and area under the curve of all VO2/kg measurements during each BLS proce-dure indexed to one minute (AUCVO2/kg min). All participants completed a survey to assess perceived intensity of exertion by Borg, and sensation of general fatigue by visual analogue scale.
Results. Maximal VO2/kg (23.16±3.94 vs. 20.17±2.14 ml/kg/min, p=0.049) and AUCVO2/kg min (18.90±3.13 vs. 15.91±2.07 ml/min3; p=0.021) during S-BLS were significantly higher compared to CO-BLS. Conversely, a more intense rate of perceived exertion (16.6±2.0 vs. 13.8±1.2, p=0.001) and sensation of general fatigue (86.5±10.8 vs. 75.0±14.3, p=0.058) were associated with CO-BLS. Neither sensa-tion of general fatigue, nor perceived exer-tion correlated with energy expenditure.
Conclusions. Energy expenditure of S-BLS was higher than of CO-BLS in our study, while sensation of fatigue and perceived exertion reflected the opposite association.
basic life support, energy ex-penditure, general fatigue
ROMAN SKULEC,ANATOLIJ TRUHLAR,VLADIMIR VONDRUSKA,RENATA PARIZKOVA,JAROSLAVA DUDAKOVA,DAVID ASTAPENKO,TOMAS SUCHY,CHRISTIAN LEHMANN,VLADIMIR CERNY. Rescuer fatigue does not correlate to energy expenditure during simulated basic life support. Signa Vitae. 2016. 12(S1);58-62.
1. Koster RW, Baubin MA, Bossaert LL, Caballero A, Cassan P, Castrén M, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resus-citation 2010 Section 2. Adult basic life support and use of automated external defibrillators. Resuscitation 2010;81:1277–92.
2. Pinheiro Volp AC, Esteves de Oliveira FC, Duarte Moreira Alves R, Esteves EA, Bressan J. Energy expenditure: components and evaluation methods. Nutr Hosp 2011;26:430-40.
3. Borg G. Studia Psychologica et Paedagogica, Series altera, Investigationes XI. Lund, Sweden: Gleerup; 1962.
4. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, Meckes N, Bassett DR, Tudor-Locke C, et al. 2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: a second update of codes and MET values. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011;43:1575–81.
5. Cho GC, Sohn YD, Kang KH, Lee WW, Lim KS, Kim W, et al. The effect of basic life support education on laypersons’ willingness in performing bystander hands only cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 2010;81:691–4.
6. Handley AJ, Koster R, Monsieurs K, Perkins GD, Davies S, Bossaert L. European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2005. Section 2. Adult basic life support and use of automated external defibrillators. Resuscitation 2005;67 Suppl 1:S7–23.
7. Heidenreich JW, Berg R a, Higdon T a, Ewy G a, Kern KB, Sanders AB. Rescuer fatigue: standard versus continuous chest-compres-sion cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Acad Emerg Med 2006;13:1020–6.
8. Neset A, Birkenes TS, Myklebust H, Mykletun RJ, Odegaard S, Kramer-Johansen J. A randomized trial of the capability of elderly lay persons to perform chest compression only CPR versus standard 30:2 CPR. Resuscitation 2010;81:887–92.
9. McDonald CH, Heggie J, Jones CM, Thorne CJ, Hulme J. Rescuer fatigue under the 2010 ERC guidelines, and its effect on cardiopul-monary resuscitation (CPR) performance. Emerg Med J 2013;30:623–7.
10. Gutwirth H, Williams B, Boyle M. Rescuer fatigue in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a review of the literature. JEPHC 2009;7:19-27.
11. Odegaard S, Saether E, Steen PA, Wik L. Quality of lay person CPR performance with compression: ventilation ratios 15:2, 30:2 or continuous chest compressions without ventilations on manikins. Resuscitation 2006;71:335–40.
12. Jones CM, Owen A, Thorne CJ, Hulme J. Comparison of the quality of basic life support provided by rescuers trained using the 2005 or 2010 ERC guidelines. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2012;20:53.
13. Deschilder K, De Vos R, Stockman W. The effect on quality of chest compressions and exhaustion of a compression–ventilation ratio of 30:2 versus 15:2 during cardiopulmonary resuscitation–a randomised trial. Resuscitation 2007;74:113–8.
14. Vaillancourt C, Midzic I, Taljaard M, Chisamore B. Performer fatigue and CPR quality comparing 30:2 to 15:2 compression to ven-tilation ratios in older bystanders: A randomized crossover trial. Resuscitation 2011;82:51–6.
15. Trowbridge C, Parekh JN, Ricard MD, Potts J, Patrickson WC, Cason CL. A randomized cross-over study of the quality of cardio-pulmonary resuscitation among females performing 30:2 and hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation. BMC Nurs 2009;8:6-18.
16. Shultz JJ, Mianulli MJ, Gisch TM, Coffeen PR, Haidet GC, Lurie KG. Comparison of exertion required to perform standard and ac-tive compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 1995;29:23–31.
17. Jones AYM, Lee RYW. Rescuer’s position and energy consumption, spinal kinetics, and effectiveness of simulated cardiac compres-sion. Am J Crit Care 2008;17:417–25.
18. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz a M, Strath SJ, et al. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activ-ity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000;32:S498–504.
19. Solberg G, Robstad B, Skjonsberg OH, Borchsenius F. Respiratory gas exchange indices for estimating the anaerobic threshold. J Sports Sci Med 2005;4:29-36.
20. Burgomaster K a, Howarth KR, Phillips SM, Rakobowchuk M, Macdonald MJ, McGee SL, et al. Similar metabolic adaptations during exercise after low volume sprint interval and traditional endurance training in humans. J Physiol 2008;586:151–60.
21. Larsen I, Welde B, Martins C, Tjønna AE. High- and moderate-intensity aerobic exercise and excess post-exercise oxygen consump-tion in men with metabolic syndrome. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2014;24:e174-9.
22. Zuniga JM, Berg K, Noble J, Harder J, Chaffin ME, Hanumanthu VS. Physiological responses during interval training with different intensities and duration of exercise. J Strength Cond Res 2011;25:1279–84.
23. Birkenes TS, Myklebust H, Neset A, Kramer-Johansen J. Quality of CPR performed by trained bystanders with optimized pre-arrival instructions. Resuscitation 2014;85:124–30.
24. Heidenreich JW, Bonner A, Sanders AB. Rescuer fatigue in the elderly: standard vs. hands-only CPR. J Emerg Med 2012;42:88–92.
26. Supported by the programme PRVOUK (Research Area Development Programmes at Charles University) P37/02 and by Ministry of Health, Czech Republic – conceptual development of research organization (UHHK, 00179906).
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) The Science Citation Index (SCI) is a citation index originally produced by the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) and created by Eugene Garfield. It (Science Citation Index Expanded) covers more than 8,500 notable and significant journals, across 150 disciplines in science and technology, from 1900 to the present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.
IndexCopernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.
Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.
Scopus Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.