Article Data

  • Views 587
  • Dowloads 124

Original Research

Open Access

Comparison of the Eosinophil Count to C –reactive protein, Leukocyte Count, and Neutrophil Count for the detection of bacterial infection in ill-appearing children with fever admitted to the Emergency Department


1,Pediatric Emergency Department Izmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital

DOI: 10.22514/SV102.122015.10 Vol.10,Issue 2,December 2015 pp.163-176

Published: 14 December 2015

*Corresponding Author(s): ALKAN BAL E-mail:


Introduction. From late 19th century to the present day, several authors have investigated the value of low eosinophil count as a biomarker of bacterial infection. In this study, we examined the value of eosinopenia for diagnosing bacterial infection in ill-appearing children admitted to the pediatric emergency department.

Methods. Retrospective review of the medical records of children age 1 month to 14 years who appeared ill on admission to the emergency department (ED). Data collected included; C-reactive protein (CRP) level leukocyte, neutrophil, eosinophil counts, results of microbiological tests, radiologic evaluation, and treatment given in the ED. Final outcome data were also collected.

Results. In total, 878 met our case definition and inclusion criteria. 521 patients had confirmed or presumed bacterial infection and 355 patients had presumed or confirmed viral infection. Nineteen patients died; all had bacterial infections. Neutrophil, eosinophil counts and CRP level were independent risk factors for bacterial infection in the multivariate analysis (p<0.05). The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves analysis for discriminating bacterial and viral infection showed that the eosinophil count (≤50 cells/µL) (area under the ROC curve [AUROC] 0.671; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.639-0.702) was similar to the neutrophil count (AUROC 0.655; 95% CI: 0,622-0.686), and CRP level

(AUROC 0.710; 0.678-0.740) (p>0.05). The sensitivities of the leukocyte, neutrophil, and eosinophil counts and CRP level were 57.5%, 62.9%, 61%, and 57.1%, respectively. The specificities of them were 59.1%, 63.3%, 67%, and 77.4%, respectively.

Conclusion. In our study population, although the accuracies of eosinophil, neutrophil counts, and CRP level were not enough, they had similar in distinguishing viral from bacterial infection in ill appearing febrile children. By comparison the leukocyte count had limited predictive value.


eosinopenia, CRP, acute phase reactants, childhood

Cite and Share

ALKAN BAL,MURAT ANIL,GAMZE GÖKALP,YÜKSEL BICILIOGLU,AYŞE BERNA ANIL,FULYA KAMIT,NESLIHAN ZENGIN,MEHMET HELVACI. Comparison of the Eosinophil Count to C –reactive protein, Leukocyte Count, and Neutrophil Count for the detection of bacterial infection in ill-appearing children with fever admitted to the Emergency Department. Signa Vitae. 2015. 10(2);163-176.


1. Nijman RG, Vergouwe Y, Thompson M, van Veen M, van Meurs AH, van der Lei J, et al. Clinical prediction model to aid emergency doctors managing febrile children at risk of serious bacterial infections: diagnostic study. BMJ


2. Bonsu BK, Chb M, Harper MB. Identifying febrile young infants with bacteremia: is the peripheral white blood cell count an accurate screen? Ann Emerg Med 2003;42:216–25.

3. Thompson M, Van den Bruel A, Verbakel J, Lakhanpaul M, Haj-Hassan T, Stevens R, et al. Systematic review and validation of prediction rules for identifying children with serious infections in emergency departments and urgent-access primary care. Health Technol Assess 2012;16:1–100.

4. Markic J, Jeroncic A, Polancec D, Bosnjak N, Markotic A, Mestrovic J, et al. CD15s is a potential biomarker of serious bacterial infection in infants admitted to hospital. Eur J Pediatr 2013; 172:1363- 9.

5. Gomez B, Bressan S, Mintegi S, Da Dalt L, Blazquez D, Olaciregui I, et al. Diagnostic value of procalcitonin in well-appearing young febrile infants. Pediatrics 2012 Nov;130 (5):815-22.

6. Ruiz-Alvarez MJ, García-Valdecasas S, De Pablo R, Sanchez García M, Coca C, Groeneveld TW, et al. Diagnostic efficacy and prognostic value of serum procalcitonin concentration in patients with suspected sepsis. J Intensive Care Med 2009; 24: 63–71.

7. Gilsdorf JR. C reactive protein and procalcitonin are helpful in diagnosis of serious bacterial infections in children. J Pediatrics 2012;60:173–4.

8. Abidi K, Khoudri I, Belayachi J, Madani N, Zekraoui A, Zeggwagh AA, et al. Eosinopenia is a reliable marker of sepsis on admission to medical intensive care units. Crit Care 2008;12:R59.

9. Bass DA. Reproduction of the eosinopenia of acute infection by passive transfer of a material obtained from inflammatory exudate. Infect Immun 1977;15:410–6.

10. Bass DA. Behavior of eosinophil leukocytes in acute inflammation. II. Eosinophil dynamics during acute inflammation. J Clin Invest 1975;56:870–9.

11. Montesanti M, Testa G, Biagi C, Bartolini F. Pattern of circulating eosinophils in allergic children suffering from infectious disease. Minerva Pediatr 1997;49:187–91.

12. Montesanti M, Testa G, Biagi C, Bartolini F. Trend of circulating eosinophils in healthy children and children suffering from infectious diseases. A retrospective study. Minerva Pediatr 1997;49:179–86.

13. Gil H, Magy N, Mauny F, Dupond JL. Value of eosinopenia in inflammatory disorders: an “old” marker revisited. Rev Med Interne 2003;24:431–5.

14. Shaaban H, Daniel S, Sison R, Slim J, Perez G. Eosinopenia: Is it a good marker of sepsis in comparison to procalcitonin and C-reactive protein levels for patients admitted to a critical care unit in an urban hospital. J Crit Care 2010;25:570–5.

15. Ho KM, Towler SC. A comparison of eosinopenia and C-reactive protein as a marker of bloodstream infections in critically ill patients: a case control study. Anaesth Intensive Care 2009;37:450–6.

16. Kumar R, Indrayan A. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for medical researchers. Indian Pediatrics 2011;48:277-87.

17. Prober CG, Dyner L. Acute bacterial meningitis beyond the neonatal period. In: Kliegman RM, Stanton BF, St. Geme III JW, Schor NF, Behrman RE, editors. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics.19th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2011. p. 2087-95.

18. Wibrow BA, Ho KM, Flexman JP, Keil AD, Kohrs DL. Eosinopenia as a diagnostic marker of bloodstream infection in hospitalised paediatric and adult patients: a case-control study. Anaesth Intensive Care 2011;39:224–30.

19. Kim YH, Park HB, Kim MJ, Kim HS, Lee HS, Han YK, et al. Prognostic usefulness of eosinopenia in the pediatric intensive care unit. J Korean Med Sci 2013;28:114–9.

20. Rothenberg ME. Eosinophilia. N Engl J Med 1998;338:1592–600.

21. Bass DA, Gonwa TA, Szejda P, Cousart MS, DeChatelet LR, McCall CE. Eosinopenia of acute infection: production of eosinopenia by chemotactic factors of acute inflammation. J Clin Invest 1980;65:1265–71.

22. Pulliam PN, Attia MW, Cronan KM. C-reactive protein in febrile children 1 to 36 months of age with clinically undetectable serious bacterial infection. Pediatrics 2001 Dec;108 (6):1275-9.

23. Isaacman DJ, Burke BL. Utility of the serum C-reactive protein for detection of occult bacterial infection in children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002 Sep; 156 (9):

905- 9. Erratum in: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2003 Feb;157(2):208.

24. Peltola H, Jaakkola M. C-reactive protein in early detection of bacteremic versus viral infections in immunocompetent and compromised children. J Pediatr 1988 Oct;113(4):641-6.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.

IndexCopernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.

Scopus: CiteScore 0.5(2019) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.

Submission Turnaround Time