Article Data

  • Views 587
  • Dowloads 140

Original Research

Open Access

Effect of adjusting the positive end-expiratory pressure levels based on the driving pressure in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial

  • Yi Zheng1
  • Juncheng Xiong1
  • Qian Zhuo1
  • Zonghuai Pan1
  • Lvdan Huang2,*,

1Department of Anesthesiology, Wenzhou People’s Hospital, 325000 Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China

2Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, 325000 Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China

DOI: 10.22514/sv.2024.109 Vol.20,Issue 9,September 2024 pp.39-47

Submitted: 26 November 2023 Accepted: 29 December 2023

Published: 08 September 2024

*Corresponding Author(s): Lvdan Huang E-mail: huanglvdan@wzhospital.cn

Abstract

A high incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) occurs in elderly patients due to general anesthesia. Studies show lower ventilation driving pressures may result in fewer PPCs. Appropriate levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may also help prevent developing PPCs in patients undergoing general anesthesia. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that driving pressure-guided PEEP titration ventilation could effectively reduce the incidence of PPCs, optimize respiratory mechanics, and improve lung oxygenation during mechanical ventilation in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. This randomized, parallel group, patient- and outcome assessor-blinded, single-center trial included a total of 70 elderly patients scheduled for laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: the titration group (receiving driving pressure-guided PEEP titration ventilation) and the control group (receiving a fixed PEEP of 5 cmH2O). The primary endpoint was the incidence of PPCs ≥moderate severity within 7 days after surgery. The secondary endpoints included pulmonary oxygenation and respiratory mechanics values during surgery, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge times, and length of hospital stay. The incidence of PPCs ≥moderate severity within 7 days after surgery was significantly lower in the titration group (17.1%) than in the control group (45.7%) (Relative Risk (RR), 0.375; 95% Confidence Interval (CI), 0.166 to 0.845; p = 0.010). The titration group demonstrated higher dynamic lung compliance and oxygenation during mechanical ventilation than the control group. PACU discharge times and length of hospital stay were similar in both groups (p > 0.05). In elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery, driving pressure-guided PEEP titration ventilation significantly reduced the incidence of PPCs and increased dynamic lung compliance and oxygenation.


Keywords

Postoperative pulmonary complications; Positive end-expiratory pressure titration; Driving pressure; Lung protective ventilation strategies


Cite and Share

Yi Zheng,Juncheng Xiong,Qian Zhuo,Zonghuai Pan,Lvdan Huang. Effect of adjusting the positive end-expiratory pressure levels based on the driving pressure in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Signa Vitae. 2024. 20(9);39-47.

References

[1] Quan JC, Zhou XJ, Mei SW, Liu JG, Qiu WL, Zhang JZ, et al. Short- and long-term results of open vs laparoscopic multisegmental resection and anastomosis for synchronous colorectal cancer located in separate segments. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2023; 15: 1969–1977.

[2] Vilsan J, Maddineni SA, Ahsan N, Mathew M, Chilakuri N, Yadav N, et al. Open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches to treat colorectal cancer: a comprehensive review of literature. Cureus. 2023; 15: e38956.

[3] Yang Y, Geng Y, Zhang D, Wan Y, Wang R. Effect of lung recruitment maneuvers on reduction of atelectasis determined by lung ultrasound in patients more than 60 years old undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colorectal carcinoma: a prospective study at a single center. Medical Science Monitor. 2021; 27: e926748.

[4] Sun M, Jia R, Wang L, Sun D, Wei M, Wang T, et al. Effect of protective lung ventilation on pulmonary complications after laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Frontiers in Medicine. 2023; 10: 1171760.

[5] Young CC, Harris EM, Vacchiano C, Bodnar S, Bukowy B, Elliott RRD, et al. Lung-protective ventilation for the surgical patient: international expert panel-based consensus recommendations. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2019; 123: 898–913.

[6] Neto AS, Hemmes SNT, Barbas CSV, Beiderlinden M, Fernandez-Bustamante A, Futier E, et al. Association between driving pressure and development of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for general anaesthesia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 2016; 4: 272–280.

[7] Canet J, Gallart L, Gomar C, Paluzie G, Vallès J, Castillo J, et al. Prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in a population-based surgical cohort. Anesthesiology. 2010; 113: 1338–1350.

[8] Nakahira J, Nakano S, Minami T. Evaluation of alveolar recruitment maneuver on respiratory resistance during general anesthesia: a prospective observational study. BMC Anesthesiology. 2020; 20: 264.

[9] Pan LL, Gao LL, Yang L, Pan CX, Yin YH, Zhu Y, et al. Effect of EIT-guided individualized PEEP setting on the incidence of hypoxemia in elderly patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Chinese Medical Journal. 2022; 102: 3727–3733. (In Chinese)

[10] Ernest EE, Bhattacharjee S, Baidya DK, Anand RK, Ray BR, Bansal VK, et al. Effect of incremental PEEP titration on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: a randomized controlled trial. To be published in Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing. 2023. [Preprint].

[11] Mini G, Ray BR, Anand RK, Muthiah T, Baidya DK, Rewari V, et al. Effect of driving pressure-guided positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration on postoperative lung atelectasis in adult patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Surgery. 2021; 170: 277–283.

[12] Zhang C, Xu F, Li W, Tong X, Xia R, Wang W, et al. Driving pressure-guided individualized positive end-expiratory pressure in abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2021; 133: 1197–1205.

[13] Meier A, Sell RE, Malhotra A. Driving pressure for ventilation of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Anesthesiology. 2020; 132: 1569–1576.

[14] Nithiuthai J, Siriussawakul A, Junkai R, Horugsa N, Jarungjitaree S, Triyasunant N. Do ARISCAT scores help to predict the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in elderly patients after upper abdominal surgery? An observational study at a single university hospital. Perioperative Medicine. 2021; 10: 43.

[15] Costa Leme A, Hajjar LA, Volpe MS, Fukushima JT, De Santis Santiago RR, Osawa EA, et al. Effect of intensive vs moderate alveolar recruitment strategies added to lung-protective ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications. JAMA. 2017; 317: 1422.

[16] Hulzebos EHJ, Helders PJM, Favié NJ, De Bie RA, Brutel de la Riviere A, Van Meeteren NLU. Preoperative intensive inspiratory muscle training to prevent postoperative pulmonary complications in high-risk patients undergoing CABG surgery. JAMA. 2006; 296: 1851.

[17] Kim YJ, Kim BR, Kim HW, Jung J, Cho H, Seo J, et al. Effect of driving pressure-guided positive end-expiratory pressure on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic surgery: a randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2023; 131: 955–965.

[18] Wang X, Guo K, Zhao Y, Li T, Yang Y, Xu L, et al. Lung-protective effects of lidocaine infusion on patients with intermediate/high risk of postoperative pulmonary complications: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Drug Design, Development and Therapy. 2022; 16: 1041–53.

[19] Fu Y, Zhang Y, Gao J, Fu H, Si L, Gao Y. Effects of lung-protective ventilation strategy on lung aeration loss and postoperative pulmonary complications in moderate-risk patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Minerva Anestesiologica. 2021; 87: 644–662.

[20] Ferrando C, Soro M, Unzueta C, Canet J, Tusman G, Suarez-Sipmann F, et al. Rationale and study design for an individualised perioperative open-lung ventilatory strategy with a high versus conventional inspiratory oxygen fraction (iPROVE-O2) and its effects on surgical site infection: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2017; 7: e016765.

[21] Sabaté S, Mazo V, Canet J. Predicting postoperative pulmonary complications. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 2014; 27: 201–209.

[22] Haines KL, Agarwal S. Postoperative pulmonary complications—a multifactorial outcome. JAMA Surgery. 2017; 152: 166.

[23] Piccioni F, Spagnesi L, Pelosi P, Bignami E, Guarnieri M, Fumagalli L, et al. Postoperative pulmonary complications and mortality after major abdominal surgery. An observational multicenter prospective study. Minerva Anestesiologica. 2023; 89: 964–976.

[24] Fernandez-Bustamante A, Frendl G, Sprung J, Kor DJ, Subramaniam B, Martinez Ruiz R, et al. Postoperative pulmonary complications, early mortality, and hospital stay following noncardiothoracic surgery. JAMA Surgery. 2017; 152: 157.

[25] Morris K, Weston K, Davy A, Silva S, Goode V, Pereira K, et al. Identification of risk factors for postoperative pulmonary complications in general surgery patients in a low-middle income country. PLOS ONE. 2022; 17: e0274749.

[26] Nguyen TK, Nguyen VL, Nguyen TG, Mai DH, Nguyen NQ, Vu TA, et al. Lung-protective mechanical ventilation for patients undergoing abdominal laparoscopic surgeries: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiology. 2021; 21: 95.

[27] Tonetti T, Vasques F, Rapetti F, Maiolo G, Collino F, Romitti F, et al. Driving pressure and mechanical power: new targets for VILI prevention. Annals of Translational Medicine. 2017; 5: 286–286.

[28] Williams EC, Motta-Ribeiro GC, Vidal Melo MF. Driving pressure and transpulmonary pressure. Anesthesiology. 2019; 131: 155–163.

[29] Spadaro S, Grasso S, Karbing DS, Santoro G, Cavallesco G, Maniscalco P, et al. Physiological effects of two driving pressure-based methods to set positive end-expiratory pressure during one lung ventilation. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing. 2021; 35: 1149–1157.

[30] Pereira SM, Tucci MR, Morais CCA, Simões CM, Tonelotto BFF, Pompeo MS, et al. Individual positive end-expiratory pressure settings optimize intraoperative mechanical ventilation and reduce postoperative atelectasis. Anesthesiology. 2018; 129: 1070–1081.

[31] Qian M, Yang F, Zhao L, Shen J, Xie Y. Individualized positive end-expiratory pressure titration on respiration and circulation in elderly patients undergoing spinal surgery in prone position under general anesthesia. American Journal of Translational Research. 2021; 13: 13835–13844.

[32] Silva PL, Rocco PRM. The basics of respiratory mechanics: ventilator-derived parameters. Annals of Translational Medicine. 2018; 6: 376.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,200 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Chemical Abstracts Service Source Index The CAS Source Index (CASSI) Search Tool is an online resource that can quickly identify or confirm journal titles and abbreviations for publications indexed by CAS since 1907, including serial and non-serial scientific and technical publications.

Index Copernicus The Index Copernicus International (ICI) Journals database’s is an international indexation database of scientific journals. It covered international scientific journals which divided into general information, contents of individual issues, detailed bibliography (references) sections for every publication, as well as full texts of publications in the form of attached files (optional). For now, there are more than 58,000 scientific journals registered at ICI.

Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research (GFMER) is a non-profit organization established in 2002 and it works in close collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the Foundation are to promote and develop health education and research programs.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.3 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Embase Embase (often styled EMBASE for Excerpta Medica dataBASE), produced by Elsevier, is a biomedical and pharmacological database of published literature designed to support information managers and pharmacovigilance in complying with the regulatory requirements of a licensed drug.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top